Does Dr. Ben Carson endorse Memogenesis brain supplements?

Checked on January 5, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

No — available fact‑checking and reporting show there is no credible evidence that Dr. Ben Carson has endorsed a product called Memogenesis or similar “brain supplements,” and representatives for Carson have explicitly denied such endorsements; social‑media ads and altered clips are the likely source of the claims [1] [2] [3].

1. The claim and how it appears online

Social‑media adverts and short video clips circulating on platforms have promoted purported “brain cures” and used footage and images purporting to show celebrities endorsing those products; fact‑checkers report that such posts often use fabricated headlines, altered images or audio, and fake news formats to imply endorsements that never happened — a pattern explicitly observed around claims attributed to Ben Carson [1] [2].

2. Direct rebuttals from Carson’s camp

Carson’s nonprofit, the American Cornerstone Institute, and other spokespeople have told fact‑checkers that Dr. Carson “has given no such endorsement,” and in at least one instance a spokesman said he had never “developed, endorsed, or even heard” of the product being promoted in the clips — an unequivocal denial captured in multiple fact checks [1] [2].

3. Independent fact‑checking and evidence (or lack of it)

Investigations by established fact‑checkers found no verifiable link between Carson and the advertised supplements: AFP flagged Facebook ads as fake and scams using altered images and false articles [1], AFP again debunked video clips tying Carson to an alleged nasal spray for Alzheimer’s as fabricated or repurposed archival footage [2], and Snopes found no evidence Carson created or won awards for any brain supplement [3].

4. The methods used to manufacture fake endorsements

Reporters and fact‑checkers note a recurring toolkit behind these hoaxes: repackaged archival interviews, doctored headlines and imagery, and edited audio that splices public remarks into new, misleading contexts — tactics that can make it appear a public figure endorses a product without any real involvement, and which were documented in the cases involving Carson [1] [2].

5. Why the denials and fact checks matter for consumers

These fake endorsements are not harmless publicity stunts; regulators warn that health‑product scams proliferate on social media and closed messaging apps, and fact‑checkers emphasize that there is no credible scientific evidence behind many advertised “cures” for dementia or Alzheimer’s — a context that makes fabricated celebrity endorsements both persuasive and dangerous [1] [2].

6. Alternative viewpoints and limits of the public record

While the available reporting uniformly finds no evidence of Carson endorsing Memogenesis or similar products and records explicit denials from his representatives [1] [2] [3], the sources do not catalog every single instance of advertising across the entire internet; absence of evidence in these investigations is strong but not an absolute proof against any conceivable future misattributed clip. Wikipedia’s biography of Carson documents his medical credentials and public profile but does not connect him to commercial supplement development [4].

7. Bottom line for readers

Based on multiple independent fact checks and direct statements from Carson’s representatives, claims that Dr. Ben Carson endorses Memogenesis brain supplements are false or unsubstantiated; the provenance of those claims is consistent with a larger pattern of fabricated ads and doctored media that use prominent names to sell unproven health products [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How do fact‑checkers verify whether a celebrity endorsement is real or fabricated?
What regulatory actions have been taken against social‑media ads promoting unproven health cures?
How can consumers reliably evaluate claims about supplements that promise cognitive improvement?