Are there any malpractice lawsuits or court judgments involving Dr. Eric Berg in state court databases since 2008?

1. The 2008 disciplinary reprimand: regulatory sanction, not a malpractice judgment

In 2008 Eric Berg received a formal reprimand and monetary penalty related to promoting chiropractic muscle‑testing and unsupported therapeutic claims, the consent agreement and Board order showing a reprimand and fine tied to Virginia licensing enforcement rather than a civil malpractice verdict ^{[1] [3]}. Quackwatch reproduces the consent agreement language describing findings that Berg made therapeutic claims “not supportable by reasonable scientific or medical evidence” and that the order included a reprimand and monetary penalty ^[1]. That disciplinary action is regulatory discipline in a licensing file, distinct from a state court malpractice suit or judgment.

2. A California judgment against the business “Dr. Berg Nutritionals” — consumer/regulatory context

The California Office of the Attorney General judgment document included in the reporting names The Health & Wellness Center, Inc., individually and doing business as Dr. Berg Nutritionals, indicating state-level enforcement or judgment against that corporate entity ^[2]. The available PDF snippet shows the company and the dba tied to Dr. Berg’s brand, which signals a state-court or state‑agency judgment touching business practices, but the source as provided does not yet detail whether the judgment was a malpractice claim, a consumer‑protection/Prop 65 enforcement action, or another statutory remedy ^[2]. The reporting therefore establishes a state judgment connected to Berg’s commercial enterprise but does not, on the supplied evidence, prove a physician‑practice malpractice verdict against Eric Berg personally.

3. Other litigation: federal lawsuits and appeals, but not state malpractice findings in supplied sources

Public legal reporting shows Berg as a litigant in multiple non‑malpractice contexts: a 2016 appellate decision from Berg v. New York Life/Unum in federal court concerning disability benefits (a breach of contract case) and docket records for Dr. Eric Berg, D.C. v. Dr. Jacob Torres in the U.S. District Court, along with a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision listing Eric Berg as a respondent in a 2021 matter ^{[5] [6] [4]}. These sources document civil litigation in federal and appellate courts but do not, in the documents supplied, demonstrate a state-court medical malpractice lawsuit or judgment against Berg since 2008.

4. What the reporting does not show and why that matters

None of the supplied sources explicitly identifies a state court medical malpractice lawsuit or judgment entered against Eric Berg personally since 2008; the evidence instead comprises a licensing reprimand (Virginia, 2008), a California judgment involving his business entity ^{[1] [2]}, and various federal or appellate cases about contract or other disputes ^{[5] [6] [4]}. The reporting therefore cannot confirm the absence of any state‑court malpractice filings—only that the provided documents do not show such a malpractice judgment—and additional searches of state court databases by jurisdiction would be required to make a comprehensive claim about every state since 2008.

5. Bottom line and recommended next steps for verification

Based on the supplied reporting, there is documented regulatory discipline in 2008 and at least one state judgment tied to Berg’s commercial entity, but no explicit state‑court medical malpractice judgment against Eric Berg personally is shown in these sources ^{[1] [2] [3]}. To move from this informed summary to a definitive answer, the next step is a jurisdiction‑by‑jurisdiction search of state civil and malpractice dockets (Virginia, California, Minnesota and others noted in the federal filings) or consulting primary state court databases and docket services to confirm whether any malpractice suits or judgments naming Eric Berg personally were entered since 2008 — a task the present reporting does not complete.