Has Dr. Eric Berg published peer-reviewed medical research or clinical studies?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting shows Eric Berg is a chiropractor and prolific online health commentator but does not clearly document a body of peer‑reviewed clinical research under his authorship; his site and PR pieces claim recent peer‑reviewed articles (Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023; British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research 2025) while independent fact‑checking and credibility reviews raise doubts about the scientific standing of his public health claims [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Who Eric Berg is, per multiple profiles
Eric Berg is identified in reporting as Dr. Eric Berg, D.C., a chiropractor who built a large online presence focused on ketogenic diets, intermittent fasting and “hormonal health”; his YouTube channel and books are prominent parts of his public profile [4]. Media‑credibility analysis emphasizes that he is not a medical doctor and that his work is tied to commercial activity [3] [4].
2. The claim that he has peer‑reviewed publications
Promotional material linked to Berg’s organization lists several items described as peer‑reviewed articles — for example a Journal of Clinical Medicine piece titled “Cancer Metabolism: Fasting Reset, the Keto‑Paradox and Drugs for Undoing ” and items in the British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research (2024–2025) — and his biography page repeats titles and coauthor listings for 2022–2025 works [2] [1]. Those claims appear prominently in PR distribution and Berg’s own bio [2] [1].
3. Independent verification and alternative records
Independent directories and fact‑checking entries do not confirm a clear, citable corpus of clinical trials or conventional clinical research authored by Berg. Foodfacts.org’s profile frames his output as videos and books built on his experience and “independent research,” not as a long record of peer‑reviewed clinical trials [4]. Media Bias/Fact Check criticizes his site for low factual reliability and notes he is a chiropractor rather than a physician; it states much of his health guidance is not supported by peer‑reviewed evidence [3].
4. Public CV vs. scholarly indexing: a gap
Berg’s bio page lists article titles and coauthors in journals that may be obscure or specialized, including a 2025 British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research article and a 2023 Journal of Clinical Medicine review listing Berg as a coauthor [1]. However, readily available scholarly indexes (Google Scholar snapshot and ResearchGate entries under the name “Eric Berg”) show limited and ambiguous bibliographic records that appear to mix individuals with the same name and academic profiles not clearly linked to the chiropractor known for online health advice [5] [6]. That mismatch creates uncertainty about authorship and academic affiliation [5] [6].
5. What this means for “peer‑reviewed medical research or clinical studies”
Available sources do not present a clear, independently verifiable list of clinical trials or standard clinical research papers authored by Eric Berg, D.C., in established medical literature repositories; promotional claims and site bios list articles and journal names, but third‑party fact‑checking and bibliographic records do not unambiguously corroborate a conventional peer‑reviewed clinical research record [1] [2] [4] [5]. Media‑credibility analysis further warns that his public health advice often lacks peer‑reviewed support [3].
6. Competing perspectives and hidden agendas
Promotional outlets (PRWeb, press aggregators) and Berg’s own website present a narrative of recent peer‑reviewed publications and advancing science [2] [1]. Independent observers and fact‑checkers present a competing viewpoint: Berg is primarily a content creator and supplement seller whose medical claims are not consistently backed by mainstream peer‑reviewed evidence [4] [3]. The incentive structure is relevant: PR pieces and the website serve marketing and brand elevation, while independent sources flag commercial motives and accuracy concerns [2] [3].
7. Limitations of the current reporting
My review relies solely on the supplied results. Available sources do not include full bibliographic citations with DOI links or entries in major indexed databases that would definitively confirm authorship of clinical trials or standard clinical research. Therefore I cannot conclusively affirm or deny Berg’s authorship of the specific items listed on his site without those independent index records [1] [5].
8. Bottom line for readers
The balance of publicly available, independent reporting shows substantial doubt about whether Eric Berg, D.C., has a conventional, verifiable record of peer‑reviewed clinical research; promotional materials and his biography assert such publications, but third‑party fact‑checking and scholarly indexes do not unambiguously corroborate that record [2] [1] [4] [5] [3]. If you need definitive verification, consult indexed journal databases (PubMed, CrossRef) for the exact article DOIs and author affiliations — current reporting supplied here does not provide those independent confirmations [5] [1].