Where does dr. harrington practice and how can patients schedule a consultation for tinnitus?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available sources identify a “Dr.” associated with NeuroMed Tinnitus Clinic and its New Tinnitus Treatment page but do not state a full name, a specific clinical practice address, or step-by-step scheduling instructions for patients; the NeuroMed site describes an integrative, brain‑focused program and says prescription support and first‑consultation planning are provided [1] [2]. Major academic tinnitus clinics (Weill Cornell ENT, Mass Eye and Ear, University of Maryland HESP Clinic) publish clear consultation pathways — intake, hearing evaluation, and clinic‑coordinator scheduling — which illustrate typical patient routes even if the exact Dr. Harrington details are not found in the provided reporting [3] [4] [5] [6].
1. Who is linked to NeuroMed’s tinnitus program — and what the site actually says
NeuroMed Tinnitus Clinic’s pages promote a 2025 “brain‑based” multimodal treatment that uses migraine medicines, anti‑inflammatory supplements, CBT and personalized sound therapy and repeatedly refers to a supervising “Dr.” and a chief medical advisor with long experience in tinnitus; those pages emphasize individualized medication decisions at the first consultation and prescription support when needed, but they do not provide a clear practice location or booking steps for a patient seeking Dr. Harrington specifically [1] [2].
2. The record on “Dr. Harrington” in available sources
The set of documents you provided does not mention a Dr. Harrington by full name, practice address, phone number, clinic affiliation, or direct scheduling instructions. The NeuroMed pages reference “Dr.” and a chief medical advisor but do not give the identifying details your question requests; therefore, available sources do not mention where Dr. Harrington practices or how patients should schedule with that named clinician [1] [2].
3. Typical consultation pathways at major tinnitus centers — practical context for patients
Academic and specialty tinnitus clinics describe a predictable intake pattern useful to patients: a comprehensive hearing evaluation, an ENT (otolaryngology) consultation to assess medical causes, and then scheduling of tinnitus counseling/management by a clinic coordinator; these centers also note that treatments aim to manage symptoms rather than promise cures (Weill Cornell, Mass Eye and Ear) [3] [4] [5]. The University of Maryland HESP Clinic further shows how clinics set fees, accept some insurance, and offer follow‑ups and support groups, illustrating common operational practices clinics use to schedule and manage tinnitus care [6].
4. How NeuroMed’s described program fits into that landscape
NeuroMed markets a multimodal, brain‑focused program that mirrors broader 2025 trends — combining neuromodulatory, pharmacologic and behavioral tools — and stresses individualized decisions at the first consultation, including whether prescriptions are appropriate; that suggests NeuroMed intends to follow standard clinic workflows (initial evaluation, personalized plan, prescription support) but its pages do not replace an explicit booking protocol or contact details for a clinician named Harrington [1] [2].
5. What patients should do next given current reporting
Because the provided sources lack a clear Dr. Harrington listing or scheduling instructions, patients seeking that clinician should: (a) check NeuroMed’s primary site contact or “Contact/Book” pages not included in these snippets for phone or online booking [2]; (b) consider established tinnitus centers (Weill Cornell, Mass Eye and Ear, University of Maryland) whose pages explain intake and coordinator scheduling if immediate, documented pathways are preferred [3] [4] [6]; and (c) use national directories like the American Tinnitus Association’s provider finder to locate named clinicians if NeuroMed search returns incomplete information [7].
6. Conflicting signals and limits of the reporting
Sources here show two realities: specialty centers publish step‑by‑step consultation flows and coordinator scheduling [3] [4] [5] [6], while commercially phrased clinic pages (NeuroMed) highlight treatment philosophy and outcomes without disclosing clinician identifiers or explicit appointment mechanics in the excerpts provided [1] [2]. That gap creates reasonable caution: promotional material can accentuate outcomes and the role of a “Dr.” without giving the transparent contact logistics patients need.
Limitations: these conclusions rely only on the supplied snippets and pages; the sources do not include a named “Dr. Harrington” profile, practice address, phone number, or formal scheduling instructions, so I do not assert any specific location or booking steps beyond what the cited pages state [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7].