Dr Michael Greger

Checked on January 4, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Dr. Michael H. Greger is an American physician, New York Times bestselling author, and founder of NutritionFacts.org who advocates a whole-food, plant-based diet and critiques animal-derived food products; his work blends accessible summaries of peer-reviewed research with advocacy and has attracted both awards and sharp criticism [1] [2] [3]. Supporters point to his nonprofit, evidence-focused platform and prolific output, while critics accuse him of selective citation, ideological zeal, and overstating conclusions from nutrition science [3] [4] [5].

1. Who he is — credentials and public roles

Michael Greger trained at Cornell University School of Agriculture and Tufts University School of Medicine and is licensed in clinical nutrition; he is a founding member and fellow of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine and has lectured widely, testified before Congress, and served as an expert witness in high-profile cases such as the “meat defamation” trial involving Oprah Winfrey [3] [6] [7] [8].

2. The platform — NutritionFacts.org and public reach

Greger founded NutritionFacts.org as a science-based nonprofit that publishes thousands of short videos, blogs and podcasts summarizing peer-reviewed nutrition research free of ads and brand partnerships, and he donates proceeds from his books and talks to charity; the site positions itself as a public-service resource translating complex studies into bite-sized, actionable content [3] [2] [7].

3. Core message and influence

The central thesis of Greger’s work is a shift away from a Western dietary pattern toward whole-food, plant-based eating and an explicit opposition to animal-derived products, a message he promotes through books like How Not to Die and daily content that emphasizes studies showing harms of animal foods and benefits of plant components [1] [3] [6].

4. Recognition and accomplishments

Greger’s NutritionFacts.org has been cited as a model of freely available, evidence-based education and he received awards such as the ACLM Trailblazer Award in lifestyle medicine; his books became New York Times bestsellers and his site hosts more than 2,000 video topics, reflecting significant public and professional reach [1] [3] [7] [6].

5. Critiques, alleged biases, and credibility debates

Critics — ranging from university science-watch groups to advocacy outlets — argue Greger tends to cherry-pick studies that fit a vegan narrative, rarely highlights research favorable to meat, and sometimes presents conclusions with zeal that exceed the nuance typical in nutrition science, with media-critique sites and Science-Based Medicine describing a pattern of selective emphasis [4] [9] [5]. Some outlets question the extent of his clinical training and how that shapes his authority, while others acknowledge that the studies he cites are often from respected journals and deserve attention despite his advocacy tone [4] [9].

6. Reading his work sensibly — what consumers should take away

Greger’s material is a rich, centralized digest of nutrition research that makes many peer-reviewed findings accessible and has had demonstrable impact on public conversation about diet and disease prevention, but readers and clinicians should weigh his advocacy stance against a broader survey of nutrition literature and recognize both the strengths of his evidence summaries and the documented critiques about selective presentation [3] [5] [4].

7. Hidden agendas and competing interests to watch for

While NutritionFacts.org is presented as a nonprofit without commercial sponsorship and Greger states charitable donation of proceeds, his long-standing association with animal-welfare organizations and explicit promotion of veganism constitute ideological commitments that shape his editorial choices; critics from organizations like HumaneWatch and media-bias reviewers flag this alignment as a potential source of bias even as others laud the organization’s transparency and volume of research coverage [2] [9] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the major peer-reviewed studies that support whole-food, plant-based diets and how do they compare to studies showing benefits of animal products?
How transparent is NutritionFacts.org about its methodology for selecting and summarizing studies, and how does that compare to academic systematic reviews?
What have independent fact-checkers and nutrition scientists said, point-by-point, about specific claims made in How Not to Die?