Dr mindy pelz

Checked on January 22, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Dr. Mindy Pelz is a high-profile figure in the fasting, women’s hormonal health, and alternative/functional medicine space, known for bestselling books, a large online following, and a popular podcast and YouTube channel [1] [2]. Her work mixes coaching, product partnerships, and proprietary programs that aim to sync fasting and diet to women’s hormonal cycles, but critics note gaps between some of her broad claims and the peer-reviewed evidence she cites publicly [3] [4].

1. Profile and platform: who she is and where she speaks

Mindy Pelz markets herself as a women’s health and functional medicine expert and is the author of several bestsellers including Fast Like a Girl and The Menopause Reset, hosts The Resetter Podcast, and operates a high-traffic YouTube channel and online coaching communities that reach hundreds of thousands of people [1] [2] [5]. Her official site and speaker profiles emphasize books, podcast reach, newsletter lists, and community programs as primary touchpoints for her audience [1] [6].

2. Core claims and offerings: fasting, hormones and proprietary diets

Pelz’s central thesis is that women can reclaim energy and hormonal balance by aligning fasting windows, “ketobiotic” and “hormone feasting” foods, and lifestyle adjustments to menstrual and menopausal cycles, with applied protocols laid out in her books and paid programs like The Reset Academy [1] [7] [3]. She also advocates using metabolic and continuous glucose tools to personalize those approaches, describing fasting as a lever for autophagy, ketosis, and cellular “reset” states—claims she presents as science-backed in public interviews and product tie-ins [3] [4].

3. Credentials and experience: formal training and narrative origin

Pelz holds a Doctorate of Chiropractic from Palmer College and an undergraduate degree in exercise physiology; she frames her clinical and personal history—including a past diagnosis of chronic fatigue—as motivating her focus on alternative approaches to menopause and metabolic health [2] [8]. Her professional biography positions her as a long-time clinician turned educator whose work emphasizes hormone-aware fasting protocols and community coaching [2] [6].

4. Reception, scrutiny, and the science question

While Pelz has large popular reach and media visibility, some nutrition and science communicators question the evidentiary basis and framing of certain claims in her books—criticisms include invented diet categories, sweeping physiological claims (e.g., “reduces recurrence of cancer”), and uneven citation of high-quality studies to support broad assertions about autophagy and ketosis [4]. Skeptics and debunkers in the fitness and nutrition space have also highlighted moments where Pelz’s public remarks depart from mainstream consensus—examples include disputing the utility of calories—a point countered forcefully by critics who cite established metabolic research [9].

5. Audience, influence and the business model—who benefits and what to watch for

Pelz’s model blends free high-reach content (podcasts, YouTube) with paid courses, coaching, and partnership integrations such as metabolic-monitoring services, creating both community influence and revenue channels that scale with engagement [1] [3] [7]. That structure can rapidly amplify practical, evidence-aligned strategies for some women, but it also creates incentives to package proprietary frameworks and products—an implicit agenda that readers should factor into evaluating her recommendations [7] [3].

6. What reporting does not establish and further scrutiny needed

Available reporting establishes Pelz’s credentials, platforms, claims, and the existence of vocal critiques, but does not comprehensively catalogue the primary literature she relies on or provide a systematic, peer-reviewed evaluation of her specific protocols’ safety and long-term effectiveness across diverse populations; those gaps mean assessments must rely on both her published materials and independent clinical research not present in these sources [1] [4] [3]. Independent clinicians and researchers should be consulted for personalized medical decisions, and consumers should seek studies directly when a claim—such as reversing or preventing disease via specific fasting regimens—is asserted without clear citation [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What peer-reviewed studies support cyclical fasting for menopausal symptoms?
How do nutrition experts critique 'Fast Like a Girl' and its proposed protocols?
What evidence exists on harms or contraindications of prolonged fasting in women over 40?