What roles has Dr. Oz held in academia and hospital affiliations?

Checked on December 19, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Mehmet (Dr.) Oz has held a series of formal academic titles and hospital leadership roles tied primarily to Columbia University/NewYork‑Presbyterian and to his clinical training at Columbia‑Presbyterian (NewYork‑Presbyterian) Hospital; more recently he is listed as Professor Emeritus and has been identified as a former director of cardiovascular and complementary‑medicine programs at NewYork‑Presbyterian [1] [2]. Public accounts also tie his academic identity to vice‑chair and professorial roles in Columbia’s surgery department during the period he rose to national prominence [3].

1. Academic appointments: professor, vice‑chair, and professor emeritus

Oz served on the Columbia University faculty as a professor of surgery and is described in multiple profiles as vice‑chair of surgery at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons during his clinical and media rise [3] [1]. Institutional biographies and federal materials characterize him today as a professor emeritus affiliated with Columbia (variously styled as Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons or Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons), language used in CMS and administration statements about his background [2] [4].

2. Hospital roles: residency, fellowship, attending surgeon, and institute director

Oz completed his general surgery residency and cardiothoracic fellowship at Columbia‑affiliated Presbyterian Hospital (later NewYork‑Presbyterian/Columbia‑Presbyterian) and became an attending cardiothoracic surgeon there in the early 1990s [5] [1]. He co‑founded and later led what was called the Cardiac Complementary Care Center—later reopened as the Cardiovascular Institute and Integrative Medicine Program or Cardiovascular Institute at NewYork‑Presbyterian—where he served in a director/leadership capacity [5] [4] [3].

3. Titles reflected in public and government profiles

Federal and institutional descriptions produced during and after his transition to government service reiterate Columbia professorship and NewYork‑Presbyterian leadership: CMS and White House‑linked materials list him as a professor emeritus at Columbia and as a former leader of the heart institute at NewYork‑Presbyterian Medical Center, framing those roles as part of his qualifications [2] [6]. Campaign, nomination and third‑party profiles likewise cite his service as director of the Cardiovascular Institute and as vice‑chair and professor of surgery at Columbia [4] [7].

4. How reporting and sources differ on emphasis and chronology

Biographical sketches converge on the core facts—surgical training at Columbia‑affiliated Presbyterian, an attending surgeon role, leadership of a cardiovascular/integrative program, and Columbia faculty appointments—but they vary in emphasis and label: some sources foreground “vice‑chair and professor of surgery” (PBS, Britannica), others use “director of the Cardiovascular Institute” or “former leader of the heart institute” [3] [1] [2]. Post‑media and political materials often use the emeritus designation and sometimes elide exact dates of transitions, a choice that amplifies prestige while offering less clarity about the timing of active clinical versus academic duties [4] [6].

5. Contested or notable episodes tied to academic/hospital roles

Oz’s hospital and academic work was not without institutional friction: his promotion of complementary therapies prompted hospital concern and led to changes in the complementary care program, and a 2003 professional sanction limited his presentations to a major thoracic‑surgery association after a dispute over research methodology, matters recorded in contemporaneous and retrospective accounts and noted in biographical summaries [5]. These episodes are routinely cited by critics as evidence that some of his clinical or research judgments were controversial within academic surgery, while supporters point to his leadership positions and publication record as evidence of legitimate academic standing [5] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What specific years did Mehmet Oz hold the titles of vice‑chair and professor of surgery at Columbia University?
What was the nature of the 2003 ban by the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and how did Columbia/NewYork‑Presbyterian respond?
How do institutional emeritus titles get conferred at Columbia University and what do they indicate about current clinical or teaching activity?