What specific diabetes treatments has Dr. Oz promoted and when?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Dr. Mehmet Oz has occasionally discussed established diabetes treatments on his media platforms—most notably referencing the GLP‑1 drug Ozempic on his show in 2019—but there is no verifiable record that he invented, officially endorsed, or legally promoted any new “diabetes cure.” Instead, since 2019 his name has been repeatedly co‑opted by misleading ads and deepfaked videos claiming he touted miracle remedies such as CBD gummies or a “three‑day cure,” claims which multiple fact‑checkers and academics have debunked [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. 2019: Mentioning Ozempic and mainstream diabetes drugs on air
Reporting shows Dr. Oz discussed the GLP‑1 medication Ozempic in a 2019 segment in which comedian Billy Gardell described using it to manage Type 2 diabetes and lose weight; that interview and other appearances illustrate Oz’s public commentary about legitimate, FDA‑approved diabetes and weight‑loss drugs rather than promotion of a proprietary “cure” [1]. Coverage by The Washington Post frames these appearances as part of a broader pattern in which Oz has repeatedly promoted weight‑loss drugs on his show and social media, raising questions about advocacy versus medical endorsement [1].
2. 2019 onward: A parallel track of fake ads and deepfakes claiming miracle cures
Beginning in 2019 and intensifying later, social‑media ads and manipulated videos surfaced that purported to show Oz endorsing instant cures—examples include a viral clip allegedly touting CBD gummies that “cure” diabetes in days and promise money back guarantees; forensic analysis showed the speech was asynchronous with his lips and likely generated or altered with AI, and medical journals and fact‑checkers flagged these as misinformation [4] [5] [6]. PolitiFact and Poynter found no evidence Oz made such claims, and pointed to telltale signs of deepfakes and audio manipulation in the ads that used his image and reputation to sell products [7] [3] [8].
3. Oz’s own responses and media fact‑checking: he warned about fakes
Dr. Oz himself publicly acknowledged the problem: he wrote in a 2019 Wall Street Journal opinion piece about Facebook ads using his name to pitch a “diabetes breakthrough,” noting that viewers had asked him whether those ads were legitimate and concluding they were not [3] [8]. Independent experts—such as UC Berkeley’s Hany Farid—have publicly debunked the ads, and established outlets have rated social posts showing Oz claiming a cure as false or deepfaked [6] [7] [3].
4. The mismatch between marketing claims and documented endorsements
Investigations into the “Dr. Oz diabetes drug” meme find the phrase has been weaponized by clickbait and affiliate marketing; sites pushing so‑called “Oz remedies” often have no verifiable linkage to Dr. Oz and conflate his general discussion of diabetes care with endorsements of unproven supplements, while reputable summaries emphasize that Oz has not invented or officially endorsed any FDA‑approved diabetes drug [2] [9]. Academic and clinical commentators warn these ads can be harmful by encouraging patients to abandon evidence‑based care for unproven products [5] [4].
5. Context and implications: media influence, conflicts, and the need for caution
Observers note a pattern: Oz has used media platforms to discuss legitimate medications like Ozempic, but bad‑faith actors and marketers have repeatedly attached his image to bogus miracle cures; fact‑checking outlets, academic forensics, and Oz’s own statements converge in finding no credible endorsement of a proprietary diabetes cure by him, even as questions about his promotion of weight‑loss drugs and potential conflicts have received scrutiny in later reporting [1] [3] [2]. Where reporting is silent, there is no verified evidence in these sources that he created, legally endorsed, or sold any patented diabetes treatment.