Which supplements for erectile dysfunction has Dr. Oz endorsed and do clinical trials support them?

Checked on December 16, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Available reporting shows Dr. Mehmet Oz has publicly recommended supplements and “natural” remedies for erectile dysfunction such as zinc and L-arginine and has been linked to marketed “Dr. Oz” ED gummies; independent coverage and watchdog reporting highlight weak or mixed clinical evidence for many supplement claims and past issues with endorsements lacking rigorous trial support [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. What Dr. Oz has publicly recommended on ED: explicit ingredients and products

Dr. Oz’s public guidance on erectile dysfunction emphasizes lifestyle and “natural” options; sources say he recommends addressing underlying conditions and suggests supplements or foods containing zinc and L‑arginine and has been associated with branded “Dr. Oz” ED gummies promoted as daily, natural support for erectile function [1] [2] [5].

2. The marketing: branded gummies, social posts and paid ties

Multiple pages and health sites describe “Dr. Oz Gummies” or “Dr. Oz ED gummies” as a marketed product line that positions daily chewable supplements as an alternative to prescription pills; watchdog reporting and reporting on other Oz endorsements raise questions about disclosure of paid relationships and the blurred line between personal advice and commercial promotion [2] [6] [3].

3. What the clinical trial record in the coverage says (or doesn’t say)

Available sources do not point to large, rigorous clinical trials validating branded Dr. Oz ED gummies. One product‑style claim page references “several clinical trials” with positive results, but those pages lack verifiable trial citations in the reporting compiled here; mainstream outlets caution that supplements often lack high‑quality evidence and that individual trial results are mixed or limited [6] [2] [4]. In short: current reporting does not document robust, peer‑reviewed randomized trials proving the gummies’ efficacy [6] [4].

4. Evidence for the ingredients he’s cited: zinc and L‑arginine

Dr. Oz has pointed to zinc and L‑arginine as potentially helpful. The provided sources note he recommends foods and supplements with those nutrients [1]. However, broader coverage about supplements emphasizes heterogeneous and limited clinical results across many supplement claims; the New York Times and other fact‑checks warn that theoretical benefits exist but rigorous research is frequently lacking or context‑dependent [4]. The supplied sources do not offer conclusive trial data showing these specific ingredients, in the marketed formulations, reliably treat ED for most men [4].

5. Public‑interest concerns: safety, adulteration and regulation

Reporting on supplement safety highlights systemic concerns: the FDA has issued warnings about sexual‑enhancement supplements secretly laced with prescription drugs, and experts warn “all natural” labeling can be misleading [7]. Coverage of Oz’s endorsements across years also documents legal and ethical scrutiny—his past promotion of weight‑loss supplements involved flawed studies and settlements—underscoring why independent verification matters before trusting commercial claims [7] [8] [9].

6. Competing viewpoints and implicit agendas

Proponents frame daily natural supplements and gummies as convenient, lower‑side‑effect options that “address root causes” and fit into a holistic lifestyle approach [2] [6]. Skeptics and journalists stress that evidence is weak, that supplements are less regulated than drugs, and that celebrity endorsements can be financially motivated or selectively cited—Public Citizen flagged undisclosed paid advisership to a supplement company in Oz’s posts [3] [4]. Both narratives appear in the sources: marketing copy promises benefits; watchdog and mainstream outlets warn of weak evidence and disclosure gaps [2] [3] [4].

7. What consumers and clinicians should take away

Given the material here, consumers should not treat branded ED supplements endorsed or associated with a celebrity as substitutes for medical evaluation: ED can signal cardiovascular or metabolic disease and requires diagnosis and treatment planning, and reputable sources urge talking to a clinician before starting supplements [1] [7] [2]. The reporting does not document strong, independently replicated clinical trials that confirm branded “Dr. Oz” ED gummies improve erectile dysfunction for most users [6] [4].

Limitations: this summary uses only the provided reporting. The sources do not include peer‑reviewed trial publications for any specific “Dr. Oz” ED product, and they do not show clinical‑trial level evidence supporting the marketed gummies [6] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Which natural supplements has dr. oz promoted for erectile dysfunction and when did he endorse them?
What does high-quality clinical trial evidence say about l-arginine for erectile dysfunction?
Are herbal remedies like ginseng, yohimbe, and horny goat weed effective and safe for erectile dysfunction?
How do supplements for erectile dysfunction compare to prescription treatments like sildenafil in trials?
What are the known risks, interactions, and regulation issues with erectile dysfunction supplements?