Have state medical boards or the federation of state medical boards disciplined or investigated dr. pete sulack or his protocols
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available public records and the set of searched sources contain no mention that any state medical board or the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) has opened an investigation or taken disciplinary action against Dr. Pete Sulack or his treatment protocols; Dr. Sulack appears in public-facing bios, ministry pages and clinic profiles [1] [2] [3]. Resources cited here explain how to search for disciplinary histories (DocInfo, state board sites) and summarize board powers and processes, but they do not list Dr. Sulack [4] [5] [6].
1. What the records you provided actually say
The specific pages in your search results include Dr. Pete Sulack’s personal and professional websites, a Progressive Medical Center provider page, speaking‑engagement and ministry pages, and general state board or FSMB guidance on discipline and lookups [1] [2] [3] [7] [8]. None of the provided state board disciplinary listings or the FSMB pages in your results return a named disciplinary entry for Dr. Sulack (available sources do not mention any board action against Dr. Sulack) [9] [10] [4] [11].
2. How to interpret silence in these sources
Silence in these supplied results does not prove absence of investigation or discipline in every possible repository. The FSMB and state boards maintain databases and public notices — for example DocInfo and individual state board “disciplinary actions” pages — that are the proper places to check [4] [9] [10]. The materials you supplied include state board landing pages but not a specific DocInfo lookup result for Dr. Sulack; therefore the current reporting cannot confirm any board action either way [4].
3. What state boards and the FSMB can do—and why that matters here
State medical boards can investigate complaints, hold hearings and impose sanctions including reprimand, probation, suspension or revocation of license; the FSMB aggregates data and encourages reporting to boards [5]. That structural context explains why a disciplinary action against a clinician, if it existed, would normally appear in state board sanctions pages or the FSMB/DocInfo records — sources you have in your search set — yet those records do not show Dr. Sulack in the provided material [5] [6].
4. Where investigators and the public typically look
Journalists and consumers use state board license‑lookup pages and the FSMB’s DocInfo to find disciplinary histories; news outlets advise checking both because detail and accessibility vary by state board [4] [6]. Your search results include general disciplinary pages (Maryland, Nevada) but no specific entry naming Dr. Sulack; to move beyond the limits of these search snippets, the next step is to run a DocInfo query and the license‑lookup pages for the state where Dr. Sulack is licensed [9] [10] [4].
5. Alternative explanations and reporting limits
Possible reasons why no discipline appears in the provided material include: no complaint reached the threshold for board action; complaints were investigated and closed with no public sanction; or any action exists in a jurisdiction or database not returned in your search set. The materials you supplied do not address these possibilities directly; they only show how boards operate and where records normally appear [5] [12]. Therefore claims that boards have disciplined or investigated Dr. Sulack are not supported by the current set of sources (available sources do not mention such claims).
6. Practical next steps for verification
To verify definitively, search the FSMB DocInfo database for Dr. Pete Sulack, then check the license/discipline pages of the state medical board where he holds a license; if you find an entry, the board’s sanction page typically provides dates and reasons [4] [9] [10]. If the search returns nothing, that result is consistent with the current reporting but not an absolute legal statement — only the boards’ public records or published orders can confirm whether an investigation or sanction occurred [4] [5].
Limitations: this report relies solely on the documents and search snippets you provided; it does not include a live DocInfo query or full state‑board searches beyond those links (final source set: [9]–[8], [4]–p2_s9).