Is the formula of Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz cure for diabetes real?

1. The claim being sold: a too-good-to-be-true cure

Online ads and viral posts have promoted a rapid diabetes cure — sometimes framed as a cheap supplement, CBD gummy, or a parasite-removal product — and attribute the endorsement to recognizable TV doctors like Dr. Oz and Dr. Phil; the advertisements promise near-instant normalization of blood sugar and recovery of diabetes-related damage ^{[1] [4]}. These ads use classic scam language — “secret” remedies, conspiracies about pharmaceutical suppression, and dramatic before/after promises — which are red flags for deceptive marketing ^[6].

2. Technical exposure: AI deepfakes and manipulated video

Experts including UC Berkeley’s Hany Farid and independent researchers have identified that many of the clips showing Dr. Oz promoting a diabetes cure are deepfaked or asynchronously dubbed, with artificial intelligence used to sync speech to a public figure’s lips in order to manufacture credibility ^{[3] [1]}. Poynter’s fact-checking work concluded that at least one viral video portraying Oz as promoting a cure and being attacked on-air was false and constructed, and noted Oz’s longstanding public fight against fake celebrity endorsements ^[2].

3. Multiple fact-checks and consumer-protection bodies label these as false

PolitiFact and other fact-checkers have rated claims that Dr. Oz or Wolf Blitzer promoted diabetes cures as false after failing to find evidence of such endorsements on the hosts’ authentic channels ^[5]. The Better Business Bureau and scam trackers document user reports that AI-generated videos of Dr. Oz and Dr. Phil are being used to sell bogus products, specifically noting impossible claims such as a parasite causing type 2 diabetes — a claim the BBB describes as “utter garbage” ^[4].

4. What the named doctors actually say and their history with fake ads

Dr. Oz has publicly campaigned for social platforms to crack down on fake celebrity endorsements and has been repeatedly misused by scammers; multiple pieces note there is no verified link between Oz and any proprietary diabetes cure product or endorsement of FDA-approved drugs as his invention ^{[2] [6] [7]}. Dr. Phil’s public comments and profiles emphasize long-term management of his type 2 diabetes rather than any cure; an AARP profile quotes his doctor telling him there is “no cure” but that diabetes is manageable with effort — a medical reality consistent with mainstream guidance ^[8].

5. Scientific context and limits of the reporting

None of the provided reporting documents any credible clinical trials, regulatory approvals, or peer-reviewed evidence supporting a rapid cure sold in these ads; the articles and fact-checks focus on the deception, AI manipulation, and consumer harm rather than validating any treatment claims ^{[1] [3] [2]}. Reporting does not rule out legitimate ongoing research toward diabetes cures in the scientific literature, but the specific formulas and endorsements shown in these viral ads have been exposed as false or unverified in the sources provided ^[5].

6. Practical takeaway and who benefits from the narrative

The profitable actors in this story are the marketers and scammers who monetize bogus ads by exploiting celebrity recognition and AI tools; fact-checkers, consumer-protection groups, and the targeted celebrities are on the defensive trying to limit harm ^{[4] [7]}. For people with diabetes, reliable guidance remains to consult licensed clinicians, rely on approved therapies, and treat social-media miracle claims with skepticism; the sources collectively make clear the “Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz formula” circulating online is a manufactured marketing ploy, not a medically validated cure ^{[2] [4]}.