Dr phil and dr oz product for diabetes

Checked on January 3, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Mass-market ads and social posts claiming that Dr. Mehmet Oz or Dr. Phil endorse miracle “diabetes cures” — especially CBD gummy products or a fast‑acting pill — are false and have been repeatedly debunked; researchers have identified deepfaked videos and scammers that appropriate their images and names to sell unproven supplements [1] [2] [3]. Neither figure has created or officially endorsed an FDA‑approved diabetes drug or a verified one‑week cure, and both have publicly warned against these scams [4] [5] [3].

1. What the online claims say and how they spread

The recurring pitch circulating on social media promises dramatic reversal of diabetes in days or weeks — often tying that claim to CBD “gummies” or a branded “breakthrough” product and showing doctored or fake interview clips that purport to feature Dr. Oz or Dr. Phil endorsing the product; these ads are optimized to look like news stories and to prey on desperate consumers [6] [3] [4].

2. The forensic and journalistic debunking

Independent analysts and fact‑checkers have demonstrated that key viral clips are deepfakes or fabricated ads: UC Berkeley’s Hany Farid and others identified telltale manipulation in videos claiming Oz touted a three‑day cure, while Poynter and PolitiFact traced the same patterns of misuse and false attribution in multiple posts [2] [1] [3]. Scientific and medical literature does not support an instant CBD cure for diabetes, and fact‑checking outlets have found no evidence that Oz or Phil authorized those endorsements [6] [1].

3. How Dr. Oz and Dr. Phil have responded

Both Dr. Oz and Dr. Phil have warned the public that their names and images have been used without permission to market bogus products; they appeared on media outlets to caution viewers not to buy such items, and Oz has publicly campaigned against false celebrity endorsements, calling them scams that harm consumers [3] [7] [8]. Reporting and industry pieces note Oz’s effort to combat misuse of his likeness and clarify he has not endorsed any miracle diabetes cure [5] [7].

4. The regulatory and consumer‑protection angle

Regulators and consumer groups have occasionally acted against companies that used fake celebrity endorsements — for example, the FTC pursued firms that misappropriated celebrity names and distributed refunds to thousands of customers — but deceptive marketing continues to evolve with deepfakes and sophisticated ad funnels, which complicates enforcement [8] [1]. Journalistic sources emphasize that these schemes are profitable, persistent, and often recycled with new celebrity targets [8] [3].

5. Practical takeaway and reporting limits

The reliable conclusion from available reporting is clear: do not rely on ads claiming Oz or Phil endorse a diabetes cure; those endorsements are fabricated or denied by the figures involved, and no credible evidence supports an instant CBD or pill cure promoted in those ads [1] [3] [4]. This reporting cannot, however, catalog every specific product on the market or rule out that unrelated, legitimate diabetes treatments exist — readers should consult peer‑reviewed medical literature and licensed clinicians for proven therapies, because the sources at hand focus on the misinformation and not on clinical guidance for diabetes management [6] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
How have deepfake videos been used in health‑related scams and what forensic methods detect them?
What actions has the FTC taken against companies using fake celebrity endorsements for supplements since 2018?
What peer‑reviewed treatments are proven to improve type 2 diabetes outcomes, and how do they compare to supplement claims?