What exact words did Dr. Sanjay Gupta use about Neurocept's treatments?

1. How the record has been checked — and what it shows about endorsements

Investigations into on‑air transcripts, podcast episodes, and consumer‑safety reporting found no verified quote from Dr. Gupta endorsing Neurocept; the searches instead turned up statements in which he disavows any association with “brain‑boosting” products and warns against fraudulent uses of his voice or image ^{[1] [4]}. CNN‑affiliated reporting and fact checks conducted in 2025 emphasize that ads circulating online which appear to show Gupta promoting products are generated by AI or scammers, not by him, and that CNN transcripts contain no instance of him evaluating Neurocept by name ^{[2] [5]}. The absence of a primary, attributable quote from Gupta about Neurocept across those sources is the central factual point.

2. Where the false claims come from — anatomy of the deepfake ads

Multiple pieces of analysis explain that viral marketing showing Gupta endorsing remedies or treatments, including instances naming Neurocept in user‑facing content, arise from AI‑generated audio/video and deceptive ad practices rather than legitimate journalism or medical commentary ^{[3] [6]}. CNN reporting and a CNN podcast episode note that Gupta explicitly stated “that’s not me” in response to fake product ads using his likeness and that certain products like IQ Blast and other folk remedies have been falsely attributed to him through manipulated audio ^{[4] [3]}. This pattern shows an industry problem where scammers manufacture credible‑looking endorsements to sell supplements or devices, misusing trusted figures to create false authority.

3. What Gupta actually said publicly about fake endorsements and products

Gupta’s verifiable public statements focus on denouncing AI‑enabled deception and clarifying that he is not affiliated with marketed “cures” or brain‑boosting formulas; he called out specific examples where his image or audio were used without permission and emphasized the ethical and consumer‑safety harms of such ads ^{[3] [4]}. Fact‑checkers summarized his position: he did not make statements endorsing Neurocept and has been fighting back against deepfake misuse of his name and likeness, urging caution for audiences who might be misled by viral clips. That documented record is the most direct evidence available about his stance in 2025 ^{[5] [2]}.

4. What is not in the record — safety and regulatory commentary not attributed to Gupta

While broader reporting discusses safety and regulatory questions around neurology products and neurotechnology, the supplied sources do not contain any instance of Gupta commenting on Neurocept’s clinical safety, regulatory approval, or efficacy, nor criticizing the company by name ^{[7] [6]}. Independent analyses have raised questions about many brain‑health products generally, but assigning those critiques to Gupta would be inaccurate absent a direct, attributable quote. The distinction between Gupta’s general public health reporting and alleged product endorsements is crucial: the record shows the former, while the latter is demonstrably fabricated or misattributed.

5. Why this matters — consumer risk and the need for verifiable sourcing

False attributions of medical endorsements carry concrete harms: they can mislead patients, obscure regulatory status, and lend undeserved credibility to unproven treatments; the sources make clear that Gupta’s name has been weaponized by scammers to sell products, not used by him to promote Neurocept ^{[3] [5]}. Consumers should demand verifiable sourcing — exact quotes in context, primary transcripts, or direct statements — before accepting claims that a trusted medical figure endorsed a product. The reporting in mid‑2025 repeatedly underscores this takeaway: no verified words from Gupta endorse Neurocept, and available evidence points to fabricated ads and misattribution ^{[1] [2] [4]}.