How would ending ACA subsidies in 2025 affect premiums, coverage levels, and enrollment numbers?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Ending the enhanced ACA premium tax credits after 2025 would sharply increase what many marketplace enrollees pay and is likely to cut enrollment; KFF estimates the average enrollee’s annual premium payment would jump 114%, from $888 in 2025 to $1,904 in 2026 if enhancements lapse [1]. More than 22–23 million people received enhanced credits in 2025, and insurers are already projecting higher gross premiums for 2026 in response to the subsidy uncertainty [2] [3] [4].
1. What the subsidies do and who would be hit hardest — the mechanics
The COVID-era enhancements (ARPA, extended by the IRA) increased subsidy generosity and removed the strict 400%‑of‑FPL cliff; if they expire, subsidy rules revert to pre‑ARP structure, restoring higher income share formulas and denying assistance above 400% FPL in many cases [5] [6]. That means lower‑ and middle‑income enrollees will see smaller credits and households above the restored cutoff could lose help entirely [4] [6].
2. Premiums: insurers and analysts expect large price moves
Insurers and analysts are already pricing for the change. Market projections show median insurer plans are forecasting an 18% median increase in gross premiums for 2026 — a jump driven in part by the prospect of lost federal offsets — and KFF’s modeled outcome implies the average enrollee’s out‑of‑pocket premium would more than double in the aggregate if the enhanced credits end [4] [1]. Stakeholders from insurers to Brookings analysts are warning of “big increases” in monthly costs for many Americans [7].
3. Coverage and enrollment: fewer people likely to stay insured
Higher net premiums typically lead to lower enrollment. Sources say a lapse “could reduce enrollment,” shifting costs to providers and states, and that the subsidies in recent years helped nearly double Marketplace enrollment from 11.4 million to roughly 21–24 million by 2025 [4] [6] [5]. About 22–23 million people received the enhanced credits in 2025, so a substantial share of today’s enrollees would face higher bills [2] [8].
4. Distributional winners and losers — geography, age, income
The burden will not be uniform. Older enrollees in their 50s and 60s and people in high‑premium states (e.g., Alaska, Connecticut, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming) will feel the pain most because subsidies historically offset age‑ and location‑based price differences [5]. Those who in 2025 had zero‑premium plans or who are near the 400% FPL threshold also risk the largest percentage swings in what they pay [9] [5].
5. Fiscal and political context — why Congress is deadlocked
Extending enhanced credits has real budget implications: one estimate put a clean three‑year extension at about $85 billion and other proposals had larger price tags, which helps explain partisan resistance [3]. Senators offered competing bills — Democrats’ three‑year extension vs. Republican alternatives that would redirect funds differently — and the Senate failed to advance either, making expiration likely absent a late compromise [2] [10] [11].
6. What different analyses and advocates emphasize — competing perspectives
Policy analysts and consumer advocates stress the affordability and coverage losses if credits lapse; Medicare Rights and advocacy outlets note an average subsidy reduction of roughly $705 a year and warn that premiums will rise for millions [8]. Republicans and some Senate proponents argue continuing the enhanced credits perpetuates “waste” and call for targeted payments or HSAs instead [11] [10]. FactCheck and KFF caution averages can mask wide variation by age, income and state — not everyone will literally see premiums double, but the aggregate impact is large [9] [1].
7. Uncertainties and limits of current reporting
Available sources quantify likely average effects (KFF’s 114% figure, insurer median 18% gross premium rise) and count of affected enrollees, but do not provide a definitive nationwide enrollment loss figure or precise state‑by‑state premium changes for every demographic cohort; those granular outcomes depend on insurer pricing, consumer behavior, and any last‑minute Congressional action [1] [4] [3]. Sources do project substantial fiscal and coverage impacts if Congress does not act [3] [4].
8. Bottom line for consumers and policymakers
If Congress allows enhanced subsidies to expire, many marketplace enrollees will pay materially more and some will drop coverage; policymakers face a tradeoff between near‑term federal cost and immediate affordability for millions. The public debate centers on whether to extend subsidies (with substantial federal cost) or replace them with narrower payments — a political impasse that, unless resolved, makes premium hikes and coverage losses the most likely near‑term outcome [2] [3] [10].