Which specific Dr. Eric Berg YouTube videos have been formally debunked by peer‑reviewed studies or official health agencies?

1. The question being asked and the limits of the record

The user asks for specific YouTube videos that have been formally debunked by peer‑reviewed studies or official health agencies; the two reporting items supplied evaluate Dr. Eric Berg’s credentials, themes, and credibility but do not catalog individual videos that have been formally rebutted in the academic literature or by named agencies, so the available record supports only general conclusions rather than a video‑by‑video debunking ^{[1] [2]}.

2. What the reporting does show about Berg’s claims and credibility

Both sources describe Berg as a prominent online health influencer whose content emphasizes ketogenic diets, intermittent fasting, hormonal narratives, and skepticism about mainstream dietary warnings—observations that characterize his channel’s subject matter and reach rather than document specific formal rebuttals of individual videos ^{[1] [2]}. Foodfacts.org notes that his content often “diverges from those endorsed by leading health organisations” and that advice appears based largely on personal experience and independent research rather than medical training ^[1], while Media Bias/Fact Check judges much of his guidance “not supported by peer‑reviewed evidence” and flags a pattern of medically inaccurate or pseudoscientific claims ^[2].

3. Where formal debunking would show up — and where it doesn’t in these sources

Formal debunking by peer‑reviewed journals typically appears as published critique papers, replication failures, or meta‑analyses directly naming a claim and citing evidence; official agency rebuttals appear as guidance updates, consumer advisories, or direct fact‑checks that reference specific content. Neither the provided foodfacts.org profile nor the Media Bias/Fact Check assessment cites any peer‑reviewed article or government/agency advisory that singles out and dismantles individual Dr. Berg videos, so the necessary documentary link between a named video and a formal debunking is absent from these sources ^{[1] [2]}.

4. What can responsibly be concluded now, and alternative viewpoints

It is responsible to conclude from the supplied reporting that a substantial portion of Berg’s health advice departs from scientific consensus and that his platform mixes accessible popularization with claims that lack firm peer‑reviewed backing, which explains why critics and fact‑checkers find his output problematic ^{[1] [2]}. At the same time, critics such as Media Bias/Fact Check acknowledge that some low‑carb advice overlaps with legitimate research—an alternative viewpoint suggesting parts of his content may have partial scientific support even as other claims do not ^[2]. The reporting also names potential conflicts of interest—product and supplement sales tied to his brand—that create an implicit commercial agenda readers should factor into credibility assessments ^[2].

5. Bottom line and what’s needed to answer the question fully

From the provided sources, there is no documented list of Dr. Berg’s individual YouTube videos that have been formally debunked by peer‑reviewed studies or official health agencies; answering the question definitively would require searching peer‑reviewed literature databases, official agency advisories, and major fact‑check organizations for direct, named rebuttals of specific video titles or claims and then linking those rebuttals to the videos in question—work that exceeds the scope of the supplied reporting ^{[1] [2]}.