How do excess death analyses compare to official COVID-19 death counts under Trump versus Biden administrations?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Excess-death studies and raw COVID-19 death tallies tell different but overlapping stories: official counts attribute roughly 471,000 U.S. COVID deaths early in 2021 and later revisions place cumulative U.S. COVID deaths at about 1.2 million by September 2024, with "the majority" occurring during the Biden presidency — a figure that critics say is misleading without accounting for time in office [1] [2]. Multiple peer-reviewed and journalistic analyses find higher per-capita or excess mortality in Republican-leaning counties after vaccines became available, while others stress that simple comparisons of totals between the Trump and Biden periods ignore differences in length of tenure, timing of waves, and background excess mortality [3] [4] [5] [2].
1. Different metrics, different stories: official counts versus excess deaths
Official COVID-19 counts are deaths explicitly assigned to COVID on death certificates; excess-death analyses measure all-cause deaths above expected baselines and therefore capture uncounted COVID deaths plus indirect deaths from disrupted care and social determinants. For example, mainstream outlets reported early pandemic totals—roughly 471,000 U.S. deaths as of February 2021—while later aggregate tallies reached roughly 1.2 million by September 2024, with analysts cautioning that comparing raw counts across presidencies is misleading because Biden simply presided over more pandemic months [1] [2].
2. Timing and tenure change the math
Health Feedback and related fact-checking work underscore a simple arithmetic point: Biden’s presidency covered more of the pandemic’s later months, so absolute death tallies under each president are not directly comparable without normalizing for duration and epidemic phase [2]. A Newsweek fact-check similarly found that claims asserting more Americans died under Biden were inaccurate when comparing the same cutoffs and accounting for reporting lags [3].
3. Excess deaths reveal geographic and political patterns
Several studies using excess mortality and county-level analysis show that Republican-leaning or Trump-voting counties experienced higher COVID and excess death rates, especially after vaccines became widely available. Yale-linked research and NPR reporting found excess mortality significantly higher for Republican voters after vaccines were rolled out [4]. Scientific American summarized county-level disparities—by February 2022, COVID death rates in Trump-won counties were 326 per 100,000 versus 258 in Biden-won counties—illustrating a political geography of mortality [5].
4. What excess deaths capture that official counts can miss
Excess-death approaches pick up deaths indirectly related to the pandemic (delayed care, mental-health crises, substance use) and misattributed deaths; that broader lens is why some analyses of U.S. excess mortality before and during the pandemic link policy and health-system weaknesses to large numbers of avoidable deaths—for example, Lancet Commission estimates cited by BMJ that a substantial share of 2020 U.S. COVID deaths might have been averted compared with peer countries [1]. OpenAccessGovernment reported alarmingly high baseline excess deaths attributed to earlier policy failures even before COVID, though some characterizations in secondary reports require further scrutiny and context [6].
5. Competing interpretations and political framing
Campaign and partisan materials frame these numbers to score political points: Biden campaign material blamed Trump-era mismanagement for early pandemic outcomes, while opponents point to larger raw death totals during Biden’s longer tenure as evidence of failure [7] [2]. Fact-checkers and researchers counter that neither raw totals nor selective excess-death snapshots alone establish causal responsibility without accounting for timing, policy differences at state and local levels, population behavior, and vaccine uptake [3] [2].
6. Limitations in available reporting and where uncertainty remains
Available sources emphasize methodological caveats: excess-death estimates depend on baseline choices; county-level political comparisons can conflate individual behavior, state policy, healthcare access, and demographics; and official counts can lag or misclassify causes [4] [5] [2]. Sources do not provide a single, universally accepted excess-death toll that isolates presidential policy as the causal variable; available sources do not mention a definitive study that attributes a precise number of excess deaths uniquely to either presidency without confounding factors (not found in current reporting).
7. Bottom line for readers
For robust assessment, compare per-capita and excess-death rates, control for time-in-office and epidemic waves, and examine subnational patterns. The peer-reviewed and mainstream sources here consistently show higher excess and COVID death rates in Republican-leaning areas after vaccines were available and caution against simple tallies that ignore duration and context [4] [5] [2] [3].