What are the FDA‑approved treatments for Alzheimer’s and what do they do?
Executive summary
The FDA now recognizes two classes of treatments for Alzheimer’s: disease‑modifying, amyloid‑targeting monoclonal antibodies that can modestly slow clinical decline in early disease, and older symptomatic drugs that temporarily improve memory, thinking or behavior without stopping disease progression [1] [2]. New approvals — lecanemab (Leqembi®) and donanemab (Kisunla™) — join earlier, controversial antibody approvals and sit alongside cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine used for symptomatic care [1] [3] [4].
1. Disease‑modifying antibodies: what’s approved and how they work
Lecanemab (Leqembi®) and donanemab (Kisunla™) are intravenous monoclonal antibodies approved to treat adults with early Alzheimer’s disease (mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia) who have confirmed amyloid pathology; both reduce amyloid‑beta plaques in the brain and have been shown in randomized trials to slow cognitive and functional decline modestly over about 18 months [1] [3] [5]. Lecanemab was converted from accelerated to traditional approval after a confirmatory Phase 3 trial verified clinical benefit, and donanemab received full FDA approval with trial evidence of slowed clinical decline and amyloid clearance [1] [3] [6].
2. Earlier amyloid antibody history and controversy
Aducanumab (Aduhelm®), the first widely publicized anti‑amyloid antibody, was approved in 2021 under an accelerated pathway based on plaque reduction, generating debate over clinical benefit and regulatory standards — a controversy that still shapes public and clinician interpretation of antibody data [7] [8]. Medical coverage, side‑effect profiles and modest magnitude of cognitive benefit — typically measured in months of slowed decline — are central areas of critique and informed consent emphasized by regulators and clinicians [7] [9].
3. Symptomatic treatments: cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine
Donepezil (Aricept®), rivastigmine (Exelon® — including a patch), and galantamine (Razadyne®) are cholinesterase inhibitors approved for symptom management in mild to moderate stages; they boost acetylcholine signalling to temporarily improve cognition or slow symptom progression but do not alter the underlying disease course [2] [4]. Memantine (Namenda®), an NMDA receptor antagonist approved for moderate to severe Alzheimer’s, regulates glutamate activity and can be combined with cholinesterase inhibitors to help maintain function for some months [10] [4].
4. Treatments for behavioral symptoms and adjunct approvals
For agitation associated with Alzheimer’s disease dementia, brexpiprazole (Rexulti®) received supplemental FDA approval to reduce agitation symptoms — an important symptomatic option when non‑drug strategies fail — while clinicians are cautioned to weigh antipsychotic risks in this population [2] [9]. Guidelines stress using behavioral medications only after non‑pharmacologic approaches and monitoring for side effects [4] [2].
5. Limits, risks, and practical considerations
All approved antibody therapies target amyloid and require confirmation of brain amyloid before initiation; benefits are greatest in early disease and are modest in size, and safety concerns — including treatment‑related imaging abnormalities and other adverse events documented in trials — mean patient selection, monitoring, and informed discussion are essential [3] [1] [7]. Symptomatic drugs can ease daily functioning and behavior but do not halt neurodegeneration; moreover, approvals and labeling typically reflect the disease stages studied, so initiating treatment outside those stages lacks safety/effectiveness data [4] [3].
6. How to interpret the current landscape
The treatment landscape now combines modestly disease‑modifying amyloid antibodies for carefully selected early cases with longstanding symptomatic medications and targeted behavioral therapies; the net clinical gain varies by patient, and professional guidance emphasizes individualized decisions based on amyloid testing, stage of disease, comorbidities and risk tolerance [1] [2] [4]. Reporting from regulators, academic reviews and patient groups underscores hope tempered by limits: these drugs change the calculus of care but are not cures and require infrastructure, monitoring and frank conversations about realistic expectations [1] [8] [7].