What FDA-approved indications and formulations of ivermectin exist for humans in the United States?

Checked on November 28, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

FDA-approved ivermectin products for humans in the U.S. are limited to treatments for parasitic infections (oral tablets for intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis) and topical formulations for certain skin conditions (rosacea and a lice formulation); the FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for prevention or treatment of COVID‑19 [1] [2] [3]. Recent state-level moves have made some human-use ivermectin available OTC in a few states, but federal FDA approvals and indications remain as above [4] [5].

1. What the FDA has approved: the narrow, parasite‑focused label

The FDA’s posture and mainstream drug references show ivermectin is approved in tablet form for specific parasitic worm infections—most commonly intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis (river blindness)—and topical ivermectin products are approved for skin conditions: a lotion for head lice and a cream for rosacea (Drugs.com summary and FDA consumer guidance reflect these indications) [1] [2] [3].

2. What the FDA explicitly disavows: no COVID‑19 approval

The FDA has repeatedly stated it “has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID‑19” and warns against self-medicating with animal formulations; this is a consistent, explicit position in FDA communications and reporting [2] [6]. Fact-checking outlets and news coverage corroborate that claims of an FDA approval for COVID‑19 treatment are false [7] [3].

3. Available formulations in U.S. clinical use

Available human formulations in the U.S., per drug reference material and FDA consumer information, include: oral tablets (prescription) for the parasitic infections noted; topical lotion formulations labeled for head lice; and topical cream formulations labeled for rosacea. Animal products—injectables, pour‑ons, pastes, drench formulations—exist as separate, different formulations and are not approved for human use [1] [2] [4].

4. Off‑label use and controversy during the pandemic

During the COVID‑19 pandemic, ivermectin was widely discussed and sometimes prescribed off‑label, driving demand and controversy; the FDA and WHO urged against its use for COVID‑19 because clinical trial data did not demonstrate effectiveness, leading to public warnings and legal disputes noted in news coverage [6] [5]. Some clinicians and advocacy groups later petitioned for expanded OTC access, rekindling debates about access vs. safety [8] [9].

5. States changing access — not the same as new FDA approvals

A number of state legislatures have passed laws making ivermectin available over the counter or expanding pharmacist dispensing for “ivermectin suitable for human use.” These state actions affect access within those states but do not change the FDA’s approved indications, nor do they make animal‑formulations safe for humans; the FDA warns animal products are different formulations without sufficient human testing [4] [5].

6. Safety framing and why formulation matters

The FDA and professional outlets emphasize that animal ivermectin products differ in formulation, concentration, and excipients from human products; those differences can cause harm if people ingest animal doses or formulations intended for livestock. Reporting documents multiple adverse‑event reports tied to self‑medication with animal ivermectin and highlights pharmacist concern about guidance if OTC access expands [2] [4] [10].

7. Competing perspectives and the political context

Proponents of wider access argue ivermectin is a long‑used, inexpensive antiparasitic with decades of human use globally and petition the FDA to allow OTC status; opponents point to lack of robust evidence for non‑approved uses (notably COVID‑19) and to safety risks of unregulated use. Media coverage shows this conflict played out legally and politically, with advocacy groups filing petitions and some states adopting permissive laws while federal agencies maintained their position [8] [9] [4].

8. Limitations in available reporting and what’s not mentioned

Available sources supplied here do not list every commercial brand name, dosing regimens, or the full FDA label text; they do not report any FDA approval for new indications beyond parasitic infections and topical skin uses, nor do they provide the detailed prescribing information that would list exact dosages and contraindications—those specifics are “not found in current reporting” among the provided documents [1] [2] [11].

Conclusion: For humans in the United States, FDA‑approved ivermectin use is limited to treatment of certain parasitic infections (oral tablets) and topical dermatologic applications (rosacea, lice). The FDA has not approved ivermectin for COVID‑19, and state laws expanding OTC access are administrative changes that do not equate to new FDA indications; animal ivermectin products remain unapproved and potentially unsafe for human use [1] [2] [4] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What parasitic infections is ivermectin FDA-approved to treat in humans and what are the recommended dosages?
Which ivermectin formulations (oral, topical, etc.) are FDA-approved for human use and how do their indications differ?
What are the major safety warnings, contraindications, and common adverse effects for FDA-approved human ivermectin products?
Has the FDA issued recent guidance or updates (2020–2025) on off-label or compounding use of ivermectin for COVID-19 or other diseases?
How do FDA-approved human ivermectin products differ from veterinary formulations and what risks arise from using animal ivermectin?