What are the specific FDA‑cleared penis pumps and their safety features?

Checked on January 13, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

FDA classifies external penile rigidity devices — commonly called vacuum erection devices or penis pumps — as Class II medical devices and sets special controls that focus on specific design features (manual quick‑release, limits on vacuum level), clear labeling, and electrical safety for powered units to mitigate injury risks [1] [2]. The provided reporting explains what safety features the FDA requires and warns about marketing claims and non‑medical novelty pumps, but does not provide a definitive public list of every single FDA‑cleared brand or model in circulation, a limitation of the available sources [1] [3].

1. What the FDA regulates: device types and regulatory status

The agency treats vacuum pumps, constriction rings and penile splints as external penile rigidity devices intended to create or maintain erections and subjects them to Class II special controls that manufacturers must follow even when 510(k) clearance is not required under certain exemptions [1] [4]. The guidance frames these devices as mechanical, powered, or pneumatic systems that use a sealed cylinder and an evacuation mechanism to draw blood into the penis and produce an erection [1].

2. Core mandatory safety features manufacturers must include

The FDA guidance explicitly recommends a manually operated safety mechanism (a quick‑release valve or button) that allows rapid release of vacuum pressure; design language further says devices should not be designed for extended continuous use, and vacuum levels typically should remain below about 17 inches of mercury to minimize tissue injury [1]. Import alerts and industry summaries reiterate the need for quick release on splints and pumps and stress similar containment of vacuum forces [4] [5].

3. Labeling, instructions, and electrical safety requirements

Beyond mechanical safeguards, the FDA’s special controls call for clear, easy‑to‑understand instructions with illustrations, explicit warnings and contraindications, and for powered pumps to meet electrical safety standards — all intended to reduce misuse and prevent harm [2] [5]. The guidance treats labeling and user education as primary risk‑mitigation measures; firms must show that their product addresses the safety and effectiveness concerns laid out in the guidance [1] [2].

4. Clinical caveats, contraindications and realistic claims

Clinical guidance in the sources warns that pumps are intended to create an erection from a flaccid state and are not cleared to enlarge the penis beyond its natural erect size; claims to the contrary are unsupported and often indicate novelty or non‑medical products that can cause harm if over‑pumped [3]. Medical summaries also note patient groups who should avoid pumps or seek medical clearance — for example people with blood‑clotting disorders or on anticoagulants and those with serious cardiac conditions — due to bleeding and cardiocirculatory risks [6].

5. Market realities: Rx vs OTC, marketing spin, and reporting gaps

Some vendors and clinics market “FDA‑cleared” or “doctor‑recommended” pumps and tout additional features such as antimicrobial materials or automated controls, but the available regulatory documents and trade reporting do not provide a master catalog of cleared brand/model names to validate every commercial claim [7] [8]. The practical difference for consumers is that certain Rx versions may be billed to insurance whereas OTC models are widely available; both categories are subject to FDA controls, but coverage and quality can vary [9]. The sources caution readers to watch for marketing hyperbole and non‑medical novelty pumps that ignore FDA guidance [3] [7].

6. What remains unconfirmed in the reporting

The assembled sources comprehensively describe the FDA’s design and labeling expectations and clinical cautions, but they do not list a definitive, up‑to‑date roster of specific brands or model numbers that the FDA has “cleared”; therefore any claim naming every FDA‑cleared pump would require further direct checking of FDA device listings or manufacturer 510(k)/registration records not provided here [1] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Which specific penis pump models are listed in the FDA device database and what do their summaries say?
How do Rx (insurance‑billable) vacuum erection devices differ in materials and warranties from OTC models?
What post‑market safety reports or recalls exist for external penile rigidity devices in the last five years?