Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: How does the FDA regulate sugar substitutes like those used in Dose sugar wise?

Checked on September 10, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The FDA regulates sugar substitutes, such as those used in Dose sugar wise, through pre-market approval and GRAS notification programs [1], ensuring their safety for consumption under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The FDA has established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) for each sweetener [1], and regulates sweeteners as food additives, with six approved sweeteners and several others recognized as generally safe [2]. However, the use of nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) is controversial, with some studies suggesting they may be linked to glucose intolerance, metabolic disorders, and other health issues [3], particularly in susceptible populations such as pregnant women, children, and diabetics. On the other hand, the American Diabetes Association recommends that people with diabetes consume smaller amounts of foods that turn into blood glucose and consider using sugar substitutes, which do not raise blood glucose levels [4], to help manage their condition.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key points that are missing from the original statement include the potential risks and benefits associated with sugar substitutes [2], and the importance of cautious consumption, especially for susceptible populations [3]. Additionally, the original statement does not mention the controversy surrounding artificial sweeteners [3], and the need for evidence-based guidelines for their use [3]. Alternative viewpoints include the perspective of the American Diabetes Association, which recommends the use of sugar substitutes for people with diabetes [4], and the perspective of researchers who suggest that NNS may be linked to health issues [3]. Key omitted facts include the specific regulations and guidelines for sugar substitutes [1], and the importance of consumer awareness and reporting of adverse reactions [2].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading in that it does not provide a balanced view of the controversy surrounding sugar substitutes [3], and does not mention the potential risks and benefits associated with their use [2]. The statement may benefit companies that manufacture sugar substitutes, such as Dose sugar wise, by implying that their products are safe and regulated by the FDA [1]. On the other hand, the statement may not benefit consumers who are susceptible to the potential health effects of sugar substitutes, such as pregnant women, children, and diabetics [3], as it does not provide them with a clear understanding of the risks and benefits associated with these products. Additionally, the statement may not benefit researchers and health professionals who are working to develop evidence-based guidelines for the use of sugar substitutes [3], as it does not acknowledge the complexity and controversy surrounding this issue [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the FDA guidelines for sugar substitute approval?
How does the FDA monitor sugar substitute safety in food products?
What are the differences between FDA-approved and non-approved sugar substitutes?
Can Dose sugar wise be used by people with diabetes?
How does the FDA regulate sugar substitutes in beverages versus solid foods?