Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the major Gates Foundation-funded projects addressing childhood obesity and diet-related disease in low- and middle-income countries?
Executive summary
The Gates Foundation’s nutrition work in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) overwhelmingly focuses on undernutrition — preventing stunting, wasting, and improving early-childhood growth — rather than treating obesity; examples include Grand Challenges and microbiome-directed nutrition research such as a 2009 $5.5 million study in Malawi and Bangladesh and ongoing investments highlighted in the Foundation’s Goalkeepers reporting and program pages [1] [2] [3]. Available sources do not present a portfolio of Gates-funded projects explicitly aimed at reducing childhood obesity in LMICs; instead, they describe interventions and research to stop malnutrition, improve gut health, scale breastfeeding and micronutrient coverage, and fund integrated “healthy birth, growth, and development” initiatives [4] [3] [5].
1. The Gates framing: malnutrition, gut health and growth — not “obesity” in LMICs
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation frames its nutrition strategy around preventing undernutrition and its long-term harms (stunting, wasting, impaired development), positioning gut health and microbiome science as promising levers to improve nutrient absorption and vaccine effectiveness [3] [2] [5]. Reporting and Foundation materials emphasize that better gut health can change how undernourished children absorb nutrients and grow — a line of work that the Foundation ties explicitly to reducing childhood mortality and economic loss, not to programs aimed primarily at reducing obesity in low-income settings [2] [5] [3].
2. Concrete projects cited in the record: microbiome and “microbiota‑directed foods”
Early, well-documented Gates grants include university-led microbiome studies and trials of microbiota-directed foods. For example, a 2009, three‑year $5.5 million grant funded research on intestinal microbes in severely malnourished infants in Malawi and Bangladesh led by Jeffrey Gordon’s team [1]. Subsequent reporting highlights Foundation support for developing microbiome therapies and “microbiota-directed foods” to treat undernutrition in Bangladesh and other sites, and funding for early-phase research into complex probiotic therapies intended to be low‑cost and scalable [6] [5].
3. Grand Challenges, integrated solutions and measurement efforts
The Foundation invests in Grand Challenges-style calls that seek integrated, measurable solutions for “healthy birth, growth, and development,” encouraging innovations that combine nutrition, early childhood development, WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene), and measurement tools [4]. These programs are designed to pilot new approaches and tools that address the multifactorial causes of poor growth, again oriented to preventing stunting/wasting rather than obesity control per se [4] [3].
4. Policy, advocacy and scaling — Goalkeepers and program priorities
In its Goalkeepers reports and public messaging, Bill Gates and the Foundation press governments and donors to invest in nutrition as a high‑impact policy priority; the 2024 Goalkeepers report projects tens of millions more children at risk of stunting and wasting without action and lists proven tools to tackle malnutrition [2]. The Foundation’s nutrition program page highlights efforts such as boosting exclusive breastfeeding, vitamin A supplementation, and integrating nutrition with maternal and child health programs — classic undernutrition interventions with documented reach in LMICs [3] [5].
5. Where obesity fits — limited direct evidence in the provided sources
Available sources do not describe a major, explicit Gates-funded portfolio targeted at childhood obesity in LMICs. Business Insider and GatesNotes pieces note that microbiome interventions might one day address both undernutrition and overnutrition, and that the Foundation has expressed interest in gut‑microbe therapies that could, theoretically, influence weight regulation — but those accounts position obesity more as a potential downstream application than a current programmatic focus in poor countries [6] [5]. Critiques alleging Gates investments promote processed-food interests are present in advocacy outlets (Children’s Health Defense) but are not substantiated in the Foundation’s own materials in these search results [7]. Available sources do not mention specific Gates grants to reduce childhood obesity in LMICs.
6. Philanthropic influence and agenda-setting — why this matters
Scholarly analysis of the Foundation’s global influence shows it shapes priorities, institutions and funding flows in global health, often privileging technological, measurable interventions — vaccines, novel therapies and scaled innovations — over broader food‑system policy work [8]. That institutional posture helps explain the prominence of biomedical and measurement-focused grants (microbiome science, scalable supplements, Grand Challenges) in the nutrition portfolio, and the relative absence of systemic food‑policy campaigns against ultraprocessed foods in the cited materials [8] [3].
7. Limits of the available reporting and recommended follow‑ups
The material provided documents prominent Gates-funded microbiome and undernutrition projects, strategic programs (Grand Challenges, Goalkeepers), and policy advocacy, but does not offer a comprehensive grant list or any systematic portfolio labelled “childhood obesity in LMICs” [1] [4] [2] [3]. To map all major Gates investments relevant to diet‑related disease and obesity in LMICs, review the Foundation’s grants database and program reports, plus independent grant-tracking studies and peer‑reviewed evaluations — none of which are included in the current set of sources (not found in current reporting).