Which active ingredients are in gelatide and their pharmacological classes?
Executive summary
Available sources show two different products named “Gelatide.” One is a marketed weight‑loss supplement listing botanical ingredients such as green tea extract, African mango, raspberry ketones, guarana, maca, ginseng and capsicum [1] [2]. A separate “Gelatide” positioning claims to be “pure gelatin” aimed at weight management by supplying amino acids (glycine, alanine) to influence GLP‑1/GIP hormones [3]. Sources do not provide a full, authoritative ingredients panel with doses or formal pharmacologic classes for a single, definitive product [1] [2] [3].
1. Two products, two pitches — names collide in the marketplace
The label “Gelatide” appears in at least two different commercial contexts: an official site that markets a multi‑ingredient natural weight‑loss formula emphasizing Green Tea Leaf Extract and African Mango Fruit Extract [1], and a separate shop site that advertises “Gelatide — pure gelatin amino acids” claiming concentrated glycine and alanine to activate GLP‑1 and GIP [3]. The sources present competing product narratives rather than a single, authoritative ingredient list [1] [3].
2. What the marketing site lists: botanicals and metabolic claims
The official Gelatide sales page highlights Green Tea Leaf Extract and African Mango Fruit Extract as key components “to boost metabolism and promote fat oxidation” and promises synergy for increased energy and appetite control [1]. An independent review of Gelatide’s sales materials flags a commonly seen formula that also includes raspberry ketones, green tea extract, guarana, maca, ginseng and capsicum — ingredients ubiquitous in budget weight‑loss supplements [2].
3. The “pure gelatin” claim: amino acids and hormone activation
A different Gelatide vendor positions the product as “pure gelatin” concentrated in glycine and alanine and claims it “naturally activates GLP‑1 and GIP hormones” to support weight loss without medications [3]. That claim is framed as a mechanistic shortcut to metabolic hormones but is presented on a commercial site rather than peer‑reviewed literature; available sources do not confirm clinical evidence that gelatin supplementation reliably raises GLP‑1/GIP in humans [3].
4. Pharmacologic class: supplements vs. drugs — what the sources allow you to say
None of the supplied sources classify Gelatide as a pharmaceutical or list an FDA‑established pharmacologic class; the items cited are marketed as dietary supplements or nutritional products [1] [2] [3]. The FDA classification system for active moieties applies to approved drugs, not proprietary supplement blends; the supplied FDA EPC reference explains how drug classes are recorded but does not list Gelatide or these botanicals as drugs [4].
5. Ingredient pharmacology — general classes for the named components
From the marketing and review sources, the ingredients named fall into standard supplement/phytochemical categories: green tea extract (a polyphenol‑rich antioxidant extract often promoted for thermogenesis), African mango extract (a plant fruit extract marketed for metabolism), raspberry ketones (aromatic phenolic compounds promoted for lipolysis), guarana (a caffeine‑containing stimulant), maca and ginseng (adaptogenic botanicals), and capsicum (capsaicinoids — mild thermogenic agents) [1] [2]. The sources describe these as common, inexpensive components in weight‑loss supplements but do not provide formal pharmacologic class labels or dose‑based efficacy statements [2] [1].
6. Evidence and transparency concerns raised by reviewers
A consumer‑oriented review warns that Gelatide’s formula mixes many ingredients into a small blend, making it impossible to verify effective amounts and therefore undermining the marketing claims [2]. That critique highlights a recurring transparency problem in supplement marketing: ingredient lists without quantities prevent assessment of likely pharmacologic activity [2].
7. What’s not found in current reporting — regulatory status and clinical proof
Available sources do not report any regulatory approvals, controlled clinical trials, or an FDA drug classification for any Gelatide product [1] [2] [3]. They also do not provide verified, third‑party certificates of analysis or dosage breakdowns for active ingredients; therefore definitive statements about which pharmacologic classes apply at therapeutic doses are not supported by the provided material [1] [2] [3].
8. How to read the claims: motives and marketplace signals
Both the slick official site and the critical independent review reflect normal commercial incentives: producers emphasize novelty and synergy to sell a supplement, while reviewers point to ingredient familiarity and low cost to argue the product is not unique [1] [2]. The “pure gelatin” vendor’s hormone‑activation pitch (GLP‑1/GIP) mirrors industry trends of invoking drug‑like mechanisms to imply parity with prescription treatments — a marketing angle that requires independent clinical evidence, which is not provided in these sources [3].
Limitations: These conclusions are based only on the provided sources; the documents do not supply a single, authoritative ingredient panel with doses or peer‑reviewed pharmacology for Gelatide, nor do they report regulatory approval or clinical trial data for the branded products [1] [2] [3].