Have any medical boards or regulatory bodies reviewed Pete Sulack's practice?

1. What the coverage actually documents: practice, media and personal health story

Profiles and promotional material in the sources portray Pete Sulack as founder/owner of a large clinic network and a leader in faith‑driven functional medicine; Progressive Medical Center’s provider page says he led one of the largest chiropractic wellness clinics and details his November 2024 grade‑4 astrocytoma diagnosis and later remission claims ^[1]. His official media and website pages republish interviews and articles about his cancer journey and treatments, and list media items and posts without reference to regulatory actions ^{[2] [3]}.

2. No mention of medical-board or regulator reviews in provided sources

None of the supplied items—the Progressive Medical Center profile, the personal website and media page, the Medium/Authority Magazine interview, the podcast, the Matthew10 fundraising post, nor the clinic listings—include statements that a state medical board, chiropractic board, licensing authority, or other regulator reviewed or disciplined Sulack’s practice ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]}. Available sources do not mention any investigations, complaints, sanctions, or licensing actions.

3. What these sources emphasize instead: treatments, protocols and public outreach

The reporting foregrounds his therapeutic views and the kinds of interventions he discusses publicly—dietary strategies, detox approaches, hyperbaric and oxygen therapies, sauna and coffee enemas as part of a cancer‑recovery narrative—and his faith‑driven messaging in outreach and fundraising ^{[5] [4] [6]}. Promotional clinic listings and his site advertise patient visits, protocols, and products, not regulatory history ^{[7] [3]}.

4. Limits of this review — absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

Because my answer must rely solely on the supplied sources, I cannot confirm whether regulators have ever reviewed Sulack’s practice outside these materials; the supplied reporting is silent on that question, so if you want a definitive answer you will need search results or records from state licensing boards, the Federation of State Medical Boards, state chiropractic boards, or court/regulatory databases—these are not present in the current set of sources (available sources do not mention regulatory review).

5. How to check for board actions — practical next steps

To verify whether any board has reviewed or disciplined him, you should search: the medical or chiropractic licensing board for the state^[8] where his clinics operate, state attorney general or consumer-protection enforcement actions, and national disciplinary databases; none of these records are cited in the current files (available sources do not mention these records) so those searches are the proper next step.

6. Competing narratives and possible motivations in the sources

The supplied materials present two consistent narratives: one positions Sulack as a survivor and clinical leader sharing recovery protocols and faith‑based outreach ^{[4] [1] [3]}, while promotional listings make commercial claims about clinic scale and services ^[7]. Those promotional aims—fundraising, product sales, clinic marketing—create an implicit agenda to highlight success and patient volume; the provided sources do not include independent investigative reporting or regulatory confirmation to counterbalance those promotional claims ^{[7] [3]}.

7. Bottom line for readers

Based on the provided reporting, there is no documented review or disciplinary action by a medical or regulatory board concerning Pete Sulack’s practice; the available documents focus on his personal cancer story, clinic promotion, and media appearances rather than regulatory scrutiny ^{[1] [2] [3]}. If you need confirmation one way or the other, pursue licensing‑board lookup and public records searches beyond these sources.