Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

How do health care sharing ministries work and what consumer protections are missing in 2026?

Checked on November 18, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Health care sharing ministries (HCSMs) are membership organizations where people who share religious or ethical beliefs make regular “shares” to help pay other members’ medical expenses; they are not insurance and therefore are not subject to most federal and state consumer protections such as ACA requirements to cover pre‑existing conditions or to cap out‑of‑pocket costs [1] [2]. States and consumer groups warn that many HCSMs lack provider networks, solvency reserve rules, guaranteed payment obligations, and marketplace protections that insured consumers have [3] [4].

1. What HCSMs are and how they actually work

HCSMs operate by collecting monthly contributions from members and using those funds either pooled centrally or matched directly to reimburse members with qualifying medical bills; membership is typically tied to a common set of religious or ethical beliefs and participation often requires attestation to those beliefs [1] [2]. Unlike insurance, HCSMs “do not assume any risk” and are not legally or contractually obligated to pay health care costs, which means payments depend on voluntary sharing and the ministry’s internal rules rather than statutory claims obligations [5] [1].

2. The most important consumer protections HCSMs do not have

HCSMs are exempt from Affordable Care Act (ACA) consumer protections — they do not have to cover essential health benefits, are not required to cover pre‑existing conditions, and are not subject to ACA limits like out‑of‑pocket caps [2] [6]. At the state level, many states have “safe‑harbor” or statutory exemptions declaring HCSMs are not insurance; as a result they often avoid solvency reserve requirements, state insurance oversight, and the complaint and enforcement regimes that protect policyholders [1] [4].

3. Practical consumer consequences: price, access, and surprise exposure

Because HCSMs generally lack provider networks and negotiated rates, members can be billed by providers at full charges rather than the discounted insurer rates — increasing the risk of large, unexpected costs if a claim is not shared or is partially shared [3] [7]. Regulators and reporting show HCSMs sometimes require members to seek charity care or other assistance before a sharing request is considered, shifting costs to hospitals, governments, or insured patients [8].

4. Where regulators and researchers see the biggest risks

Public auditors, the GAO, and health policy researchers flag that HCSMs can mislead consumers into believing they offer guaranteed coverage, while lacking audited solvency, reserve data, or clear financial stability — information consumers would want to judge whether the ministry can actually meet members’ needs [9] [1]. Thirty states have protections that limit state regulatory authority over HCSMs, creating inconsistent consumer safeguards across the country [1] [10].

5. Arguments in favor and who may benefit

Advocates and some members argue HCSMs can provide value: lower monthly costs for healthy, low‑utilization members, and a community approach that has, in anecdotal cases, fully shared expensive events like childbirths [8] [1]. Proponents emphasize voluntary sharing and faith‑based solidarity as core strengths — but those outcomes depend on the ministry’s rules and financial health [1].

6. Key limitations of current reporting and open questions for 2026

Available sources document regulatory gaps, consumer complaints, and structural differences from insurance [1] [4], but they do not provide a comprehensive, up‑to‑date national inventory of HCSM solvency, enrollment trends through 2026, or comparative claims‑payment rates versus insurance; those specifics are not found in current reporting provided here (not found in current reporting). Likewise, sources show state variability but do not list which states will change their legal treatments in 2026 [4] [10].

7. Practical advice for consumers shopping in 2026

Regulatory and insurance‑department guidance warns consumers to read the fine print, verify what is and isn’t eligible for sharing, ask for audited financials or reserve information, understand that preexisting conditions and essential benefits may be excluded, and remember that HCSMs do not guarantee payments and are not covered by ACA consumer protections [3] [5] [9]. Where possible, compare total expected monthly costs plus potential catastrophic exposure — and consider whether marketplace plans with ACA protections or employer coverage better match your risk tolerance [6] [3].

Sources cited above: National Association of Insurance Commissioners and related NAIC pages [3] [2], Mass.gov consumer guidance [7], Verywell Health [11], HealthInsurance.org [6], Commonwealth Fund/related research [1], CBS News reporting [8], Michigan DIFS advisory [5], Georgetown CHIR analyses and data pieces [12] [9] [10] [13] [4], and Wikipedia summary material [14].

Want to dive deeper?
How do health care sharing ministries differ legally from traditional health insurance in 2026?
What state and federal consumer protections apply to health care sharing ministries after recent 2024–2025 regulatory changes?
Which financial risks do members of health care sharing ministries face for preexisting conditions, denied or delayed payments, and catastrophic claims?
How have major health care sharing ministries performed on transparency, complaint rates, and legal actions in the past five years?
What alternatives exist for consumers seeking low-cost coverage with stronger protections than health care sharing ministries?