Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: The original post of this reddit link https://old.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1ikyozd/when_you_have_liver_cancer_and_your_health/

Checked on February 8, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The Reddit post discusses a case of health insurance denial for liver cancer treatment. Based on the analyses, this reflects a broader, systemic issue in the U.S. healthcare system. A recent study found that 22% of cancer patients were unable to receive necessary care due to insurance prior authorization processes [1]. The analyses highlight a specific tragic case where Tracy Pike, a Stage 4 stomach cancer patient, was denied a $40,000 treatment by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois, despite the treatment being recommended by MD Anderson Cancer Center and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [2]. Pike passed away in January 2024 [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original post:

  • Insurance companies can deny treatments for multiple reasons, including:
  • Treatments being considered experimental
  • Treatments deemed not medically necessary
  • Out-of-network care
  • Even FDA-approved treatments can be denied if viewed as investigational [3]
  • There are established processes for appealing insurance decisions, including:
  • Requesting independent external reviews
  • Gathering supporting medical documentation
  • Following specific appeal procedures [4]
  • Legislative efforts are underway in some states (like North Carolina) to reform prior authorization processes, with medical professionals pushing for changes to reduce administrative burdens and prevent care delays [5].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

While the original post highlights a real and serious issue, it's important to understand the various stakeholders involved:

  • Insurance Companies benefit from denying expensive treatments, as demonstrated in Tracy Pike's case where a $40,000 treatment was denied [2]
  • Healthcare Providers face significant administrative burdens dealing with insurance companies, as evidenced by ongoing legislative reform efforts [5]
  • Patients bear both emotional and financial burdens when dealing with treatment denials [1]
  • Medical Centers (like MD Anderson Cancer Center) may recommend treatments based on medical expertise, but their recommendations can be overruled by insurance companies' determinations of "medical necessity" [2]

The case presented in the Reddit post appears to be representative of a larger systemic issue rather than an isolated incident, as corroborated by multiple sources and similar cases like Amanda Watson's [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?