What is the evidence on honey ingestion and short‑term postprandial glucose spikes in people with diabetes?

Checked on January 26, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Clinical and experimental evidence on honey and short‑term postprandial glucose in people with diabetes is mixed: several acute oral sugar tolerance tests report smaller or comparable immediate glucose rises after honey than after pure glucose or sucrose, often accompanied by higher C‑peptide (an insulin secretion marker) in some cohorts, but randomized trials and systematic reviews show inconsistent effects and, in some cases, worse longer‑term glycemic control after sustained or high‑dose honey intake [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. What the acute studies actually show about postprandial spikes

Controlled acute tests—where participants ingest measured amounts of honey, glucose or sucrose and researchers track blood glucose every 30–60 minutes—generally find that honey produces a lower glycemic index and sometimes a smaller peak incremental glucose response than pure glucose, and in some studies glucose after honey peaks earlier then declines more rapidly than after glucose [1] [2] [5]. Several of those same acute studies also report increased postprandial C‑peptide after honey versus glucose or sucrose in non‑diabetic and some diabetic groups, suggesting a different insulin secretory response when honey is consumed [1] [2].

2. Conflicting longer‑term and larger‑trial data dilute the optimistic view

When the question shifts from a single meal to regular consumption, randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews paint a less flattering picture: a crossover RCT of type 2 diabetes patients found that daily honey (50 g/day) for eight weeks increased HbA1c, a marker of chronic glycemia, and other reviews note that some studies reported increased blood glucose or HbA1c after honey intake while others saw no change, leaving no firm consensus [4] [3]. A 2021 systematic review cited in consumer health summaries also warned that high honey intake may worsen glucose levels in type 2 diabetes [6].

3. Biological mechanisms that could explain smaller acute spikes — and why they may not protect everyone

Mechanistic rationales include honey’s composition (a mix of fructose and glucose with oligosaccharides and bioactive compounds), potential α‑amylase/α‑glucosidase inhibitory effects seen in vitro and in some honeys, and enzymes that may slow intestinal glucose absorption; these properties can lower measured glycemic index compared with pure glucose and blunt immediate spikes in some settings [7] [8]. However, fructose itself has metabolic downsides and the effects vary substantially by honey type, dose, and the individual’s residual insulin secretion or insulin sensitivity, which explains inconsistent clinical outcomes [3] [7].

4. Population and study design matter: type of diabetes, dose, and honey source

Most acute glucose‑challenge studies include small samples, sometimes children with type 1 diabetes or mixed groups, and use varying honey doses and floral origins, making results hard to generalize; the RCTs that looked at sustained intakes used relatively large daily doses (e.g., 50 g/day or graded high doses) and found either no benefit or deterioration in glycemic control, highlighting that dose and duration are critical variables [2] [4] [3]. Animal and short‑term human trials suggest potential metabolic benefits, but translating these findings into safe recommendations for people with established diabetes requires caution [7] [9].

5. How to read the mixed messages and who’s pushing them

Consumer blogs and health sites often emphasize honey’s lower GI and “enzymatic” benefits—claims that can sound decisive but rely on mechanistic optimism or small studies rather than robust clinical endpoints; these pieces can understate trial evidence that prolonged or high honey intake may raise HbA1c in type 2 diabetes [8] [6] [3]. Conversely, some clinical reviews and trials funded as independent research highlight heterogeneity and warn against assuming honey is a safe substitute for sugar in diabetic diets [3] [4].

6. Bottom line for short‑term postprandial spikes

Acute evidence supports that, in many small experiments, honey can produce a lower or differently timed postprandial glucose response than pure glucose or sucrose and may elevate C‑peptide, indicating altered insulin secretion; nonetheless, heterogeneity in study populations, honey types, doses and the presence of conflicting longer‑term trial data means there is no universal clinical endorsement that honey is safe or preferable for people with diabetes—especially when consumed frequently or in large amounts [1] [2] [3] [4]. The evidence base is limited and inconsistent enough that individual monitoring and clinician guidance are necessary to judge short‑term and sustained effects [3] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What do continuous glucose monitor (CGM) studies show about individual glycemic responses to honey versus sugar in people with type 2 diabetes?
How does the floral source and processing of honey (raw vs. commercial) change its glycemic index and metabolic effects?
What are the long‑term effects (≥6 months) of regular modest honey intake on HbA1c and cardiovascular risk markers in randomized trials of people with type 2 diabetes?