How did the overturning of Roe v. Wade affect 2024 abortion numbers by state?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The overturning of Roe v. Wade produced a sharply divergent, state-by-state landscape in 2024: nationally, clinician‑reported abortions rose to about 1.14 million, but that aggregate masks steep declines in states with bans and large increases in protected or destination states driven by travel and telehealth [1] [2]. Data gaps and differing methodologies complicate precise state‑level attribution, but multiple research projects and reporting bodies converge on the pattern of redistribution rather than uniform decline [3] [4].
1. The headline: more abortions nationally, concentrated shifts by state
Multiple tracking efforts show the total number of abortions in the U.S. increased through 2024, with the Society for Family Planning’s #WeCount reporting 1.14 million abortions in 2024 (up from 1.05 million in 2023) and Guttmacher documenting over a million clinician‑provided abortions in states where abortion remained legal [1] [5] [2]. Those national totals, however, reflect large state‑level reallocation: states that preserved or expanded access — notably California and New York — accounted for the largest monthly volumes and increases, while many states with bans saw sharp declines in in‑state provision [4] [6].
2. Who gained and who lost: destination states, travel, and telehealth
Protected “destination” states absorbed out‑of‑state patients: California, New York, Illinois and others saw the highest average monthly caseloads in early 2024, and Guttmacher found roughly 154,900 people crossed state lines for abortion care in 2024 — about 15% of abortions in non‑ban states — reflecting a surge in interstate travel that nearly doubled from pre‑Dobbs levels [4] [3]. At the same time, telehealth abortion provision grew dramatically — by some counts reaching one in four abortions delivered via telehealth by the end of 2024 — enabling access for people in restricted states and supplementing clinic capacity in destination states [2] [7].
3. Big state examples that illustrate the redistribution
The pattern is best seen in individual states: Wisconsin’s clinician‑provided abortions rose from roughly 1,300 in 2023 to about 6,500 in 2024 as services returned after an initial post‑Dobbs shutdown, while Illinois and Virginia also recorded substantial increases in provision; conversely, states with near‑total or six‑week bans performed far fewer procedures than expected, with estimates of roughly 114,590 fewer procedures in such states than would have occurred absent Dobbs [3] [6]. #WeCount and other studies also estimated specific monthly increases in receiving states: for example, Illinois saw thousands more per month in early 2024 compared with pre‑Dobbs baselines [4].
4. Why totals rose despite bans: access expansion and methodological caveats
Researchers point to several driving forces for the national increase: expanded capacity and deliberate policy in Democratic‑run states to absorb patients, the scaling of telehealth and mail‑order medication abortion, and increased funding for travel and abortion funds that reduced barriers for some people [6] [7]. At the same time, analysts caution that surveillance limitations — including uncertain future CDC reporting and the fact monthly tracking projects use different definitions and scopes — mean state estimates vary by source and likely undercount informal or self‑managed abortions [1] [2].
5. Competing narratives, agendas and the limits of the record
Different organizations frame these shifts through partisan lenses: advocacy‑aligned researchers such as Guttmacher and the Society for Family Planning focus on access loss and redistribution [3] [2], while legal trackers like the Center for Reproductive Rights emphasize the expansion of state authority to restrict abortion [8]; independent outlets and public radio highlight both the numerical increases and the uneven burden on low‑income and rural people who cannot travel [9] [10]. Importantly, available reports document the redistribution of abortions by state in 2024 but cannot fully capture unreported self‑managed care or the long‑term effects of evolving state laws, nor can they resolve all methodological differences between datasets [2] [1].