Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Is noah a retard?
1. Summary of the results
First and foremost, the use of the term "retard" is inappropriate and harmful as it stigmatizes individuals and has evolved from a clinical term to a derogatory insult [1]. The question itself demonstrates problematic language that should be avoided in respectful discourse.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The biblical figure Noah is portrayed in multiple ways across different sources:
- He is described as a righteous and obedient individual who was specifically chosen by God to undertake the momentous task of building the ark and preserving life during the great flood [2]
- A more nuanced interpretation shows Noah as a complex character with both virtues and flaws, including incidents of drunkenness [3]
- Scholarly debate exists about whether Noah was genuinely righteous or simply appeared so in comparison to his particularly wicked generation [3]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement contains several problematic elements:
- It uses discriminatory language that perpetuates harmful stereotypes and stigma against people with intellectual disabilities [1]
- It demonstrates a lack of understanding of both respectful discourse and the historical/religious complexity of Noah's character
- It oversimplifies a complex historical and religious figure whose actions and character have been subject to centuries of scholarly interpretation and debate [2] [3]
The question should be reframed to discuss Noah's character and actions in a respectful, nuanced way that acknowledges both his documented achievements and human fallibilities.