Fact check: What are the potential side effects of taking IQ Blast Pro?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, IQ Blast Pro appears to have minimal reported side effects. The most comprehensive information comes from sources indicating that there are no reported side effects of taking IQ Blast Pro, with the product being manufactured in FDA-registered and GMP-certified facilities in the US using natural, high-quality ingredients ^[1].

The supplement is described as a non-stimulant based product, which means users don't experience common stimulant-related issues such as sleep disruption, anxiety, or energy crashes that are associated with other brain-boosting products ^[2]. Multiple sources reference the supplement's ingredients and benefits but consistently do not mention any specific adverse effects ^{[3] [1] [4]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal several important gaps in available information:

• No comprehensive clinical trial data is mentioned regarding long-term safety or potential interactions with medications
• Individual ingredient side effects are not discussed, despite the supplement containing multiple active compounds
• Dosage-related concerns or potential effects of exceeding recommended amounts are not addressed
• Contraindications for specific populations (pregnant women, individuals with medical conditions, those taking medications) are not mentioned in any source
• Regulatory oversight limitations - while FDA-registered facilities are mentioned ^[1], dietary supplements are not subject to the same rigorous testing as prescription medications

The supplement industry benefits significantly from promoting products with "no side effects" claims, as this increases consumer confidence and sales. Manufacturers and retailers have financial incentives to emphasize safety while minimizing discussion of potential risks.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself is neutral and appropriate. However, the source materials show potential bias:

• Marketing-oriented language dominates the analyses, with emphasis on benefits rather than balanced risk assessment
• Lack of independent, peer-reviewed research is evident across all sources
• Promotional content appears to be the primary source of information rather than medical or scientific literature
• Absence of regulatory warnings or cautionary statements that typically accompany legitimate supplement information

The analyses suggest that available information comes primarily from promotional materials and product listings rather than independent medical sources, which raises questions about the objectivity and completeness of the safety claims being made ^{[5] [4]}.