Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Is 16,5 cm dick big?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the scientific analyses provided, 16.5 cm (approximately 6.5 inches) is considered above average to large for penis size. Multiple studies establish that the average erect penis length ranges between 5.1 and 5.5 inches (12.95-13.97 cm) [1], with some sources confirming the average falls around 13-15 cm [2].
The measurement of 16.5 cm falls above the average stretched penile length of 15.2 cm found in Argentine men [3] and is slightly above the preferred length of 16.3 cm that women selected for one-time sexual partners in 3D model studies [4]. Interestingly, one source indicates that 16.5 cm represents the average penis length specifically for men from the Netherlands [5], suggesting significant regional variation.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks several important contextual factors:
- Regional variations are significant - penis size varies considerably across different WHO regions, with men in the Americas having the largest average at 14.47 cm, while Western Pacific men had smaller averages [6]
- Measurement methodology matters critically - studies relying on self-measurement consistently report higher averages due to volunteer bias and social desirability bias [1], and most men tend to overestimate average penis length [2]
- Female preferences prioritize width over length - research shows that 45 out of 50 women reported that width felt better than length for sexual satisfaction [7], suggesting the focus on length alone may be misplaced
- Context-dependent preferences exist - women prefer slightly different dimensions for one-time partners (16.3 cm length) versus long-term partners (16.0 cm length) [4]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question reflects common societal biases and misconceptions:
- Oversimplification of sexual satisfaction - the question assumes length is the primary factor, when research indicates width may be more important for female sexual satisfaction [7]
- Lack of scientific context - the question doesn't acknowledge that "big" is relative to population averages, which vary significantly by region and measurement methodology
- Perpetuation of size anxiety - the framing suggests concern about adequacy without acknowledging that the measurement falls within or above normal ranges according to multiple studies [1] [3] [5]
The question would benefit from understanding that sexual satisfaction involves multiple factors beyond size, and that 16.5 cm represents a measurement that is statistically above average in most populations studied.