Is my dick small?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Most reputable reviews put the average erect penis length around 13 cm (about 5.1–5.3 in), with one large 2015-2021 synthesis of 15,000+ men giving ~13.12 cm (5.16 in) erect and ~9.16 cm (3.61 in) flaccid [1] [2]. Medical sources say “micropenis” — a rare, clinically significant condition — is defined much smaller (stretched or erect under ~7.5 cm or erect under ~7.5–7.6 cm), not by falling below the population mean [3] [4].
1. What the data actually show: averages, ranges and measurement methods
Large reviews and clinical summaries converge on a mean erect length in the range of about 5.1–5.5 inches (13–14 cm), based on provider-measured datasets that pooled more than 15,000 men; the 2015 systematic review and later syntheses report an average erect length of ~13.12 cm (5.16 in) and average erect girth ~11.66 cm (4.59 in) [2] [1]. Studies vary by whether men self-report or are measured by clinicians; self-reporting tends to overestimate length by around 1.3 cm, so clinical measurements are considered more reliable [5] [2].
2. “Am I small?” — statistical context versus clinical definitions
If your erect length is near the reported mean (~13 cm), you are average; the population distribution has a narrow spread and extreme outliers are rare according to the pooled data [1]. The medical definition that indicates possible clinical concern is “micropenis,” which refers to a much smaller size (stretched or erect often cited below about 7.5 cm / 3 in) and is the threshold used for considering medical interventions — not simply being below the population mean [3] [4].
3. Why perception often differs from reality
Cultural myths, pornography, and self-report bias inflate expectations. Reviews note that popular beliefs overstate variation across countries and ethnicities; measured differences are small and many sensational rankings rely on adjusted or limited data sets [6] [5]. Clinical researchers emphasize that penis size is less variable across populations than common assumptions imply [6] [2].
4. What traits do NOT reliably predict size
Multiple analyses found no strong, consistent correlation between penis size and height, shoe size, or hand size; any links reported are weak or inconsistent across studies [6] [1]. Large pooled studies concluded there was no reliable predictor among commonly cited physical features [1].
5. When size matters clinically and psychologically
Clinically, size matters when it reflects congenital conditions (micropenis) or causes functional problems; the Urology Care Foundation and medical reviews limit surgery/medical intervention to such clear clinical indications rather than mere dissatisfaction [3]. Psychologically, many men worry despite being within normal ranges; sexual function and partner satisfaction depend more on communication and technique than millimetres of length (available sources do not mention partner satisfaction studies beyond preferences; not found in current reporting).
6. Conflicting sources and how to read them
Some websites and rankings present country-by-country lists and claim larger inter-country differences; these often incorporate self-reported data or adjustment models and can amplify differences [7] [5]. Peer-reviewed syntheses and medical reviews (e.g., the 2015/2021 pooled analyses reported in clinical outlets and science reporting) should be weighted more heavily because they use provider measurements and larger samples [2] [1].
7. Practical next steps if you’re worried
If you’re concerned about functional problems or think you may have a medically small penis (stretched/erect length near clinical micropenis thresholds), consult a urologist — clinical assessment uses standardized measurements and considers hormonal or developmental causes [3]. For body-image or anxiety concerns where measurements are in the normal range, a sexual-health counselor or therapist can address distress; available sources do not list specific psychological treatment outcomes in this dataset (not found in current reporting).
Limitations and note on sources: these conclusions rely on pooled reviews and medical summaries provided above; measurement techniques, sample selection, and self-report bias vary across the cited sources [2] [1] [5]. When media or ranking sites publish dramatic cross-country differences, scrutinize whether those figures are adjusted self-reports or clinician-measured datasets [5] [7].