What are the clinical signs and typical timeline of ivermectin toxicity after accidental oral ingestion?

Checked on November 30, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Ivermectin overdose after accidental or intentional oral ingestion produces a mix of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and central nervous system signs—most prominently nausea, vomiting, dizziness, ataxia, blurred vision, confusion and seizures—and in severe cases coma or death [1] [2] [3]. Reports and reviews show neurologic problems (confusion, visual disturbances, decreased consciousness, hallucinations, seizures) can appear after supratherapeutic dosing, while timing and severity depend on dose, formulation (human versus concentrated veterinary products) and patient factors; detailed timelines are reported mainly in case reports rather than large trials [4] [1] [3].

1. What clinicians and poison centers report: the symptom set

Clinical descriptions from regulators and toxicology literature converge on a recognizable toxidrome: gastrointestinal upset (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), hypotension and allergic-type symptoms (itching, hives), and a central nervous system syndrome of dizziness, ataxia (loss of balance), visual disturbance/blurred vision, altered mental status (confusion, decreased sensorium), hallucinations, seizures and—even in extreme cases—coma and death [1] [3] [4]. The FDA consumer guidance lists most of these features explicitly [1]; a case-series review in Cureus documents hallucinations, reduced consciousness and other neuropsychiatric manifestations after supratherapeutic dosing [4].

2. Typical timing: when do signs appear after ingestion?

Available sources do not provide a single standardized onset window from first ingestion to symptoms; reporting is dominated by case reports and regulatory advisories rather than prospective overdose cohorts [4] [1]. The Cureus case report describes a “subacute” development of neurologic symptoms after repeated supratherapeutic doses rather than a single standardized latency [4]. The FDA warning and veterinary–human safety notices list adverse events associated with overdose but do not give a precise timeline for onset [1] [3]. In short: immediate GI and vestibular symptoms are plausible within hours, while evolving central nervous system depression, confusion or seizures have been reported in days or after repeated high dosing [1] [4].

3. Dose, formulation and host factors change the course

Safety statements stress that approved human doses (commonly 0.2–0.4 mg/kg for parasitic infections) are generally safe but that veterinary preparations are far more concentrated and pose high toxicity risk when taken by people [5] [3]. The sources emphasize that “supratherapeutic” or repeated excessive dosing—whether from misguided self-treatment or ingesting veterinary products—drives serious neurologic toxicity [4] [3]. Children and people with certain comorbidities may be especially vulnerable to CNS effects, according to clinical commentary cited in The New York Times [2].

4. Extremes of toxicity: seizures, coma and death—how common are they?

Regulatory and clinical literature list seizures, coma and death among possible overdose outcomes, but most published safety summaries and reviews frame those as uncommon but severe consequences of high or repeated doses [1] [3] [4]. The FDA and veterinary-medical advisories explicitly warn that misuse can lead to nervous system depression, coma and death; case literature provides examples of severe neurologic presentations after supratherapeutic exposure [1] [3] [4].

5. Evidence gaps and reporting limitations

There are no large, prospective overdose cohorts in the supplied sources that map a clear, quantitative timeline from ingestion to each clinical feature; most evidence is regulatory guidance, media synthesis and isolated case reports [1] [4] [2]. Available sources do not mention standardized time-to-onset statistics, nor do they supply dose–response curves for human toxicity outside small case literature [4] [1]. That gap means clinicians must rely on symptom recognition, supportive care principles and consultation with poison control.

6. Practical guidance drawn from sources

Authorities advise against self-treatment and warn that veterinary ivermectin is particularly hazardous for humans; poison-control calls rose sharply during the COVID-era misuse period, underscoring real-world risk [1] [6] [3]. Clinicians encountering suspected ingestion should monitor for early GI and vestibular symptoms, neurological decline or seizures and treat supportively while consulting regional poison centers—recommendations and exact protocols are not laid out in the cited materials but follow from the acute nature of the listed adverse events [1] [4].

7. Competing viewpoints and context

Some reviews underline ivermectin’s long history as a safe antiparasitic at approved doses and note extensive global use [5]. At the same time, regulators and clinical case reports emphasize that off-label high dosing, widespread politicization and use of veterinary formulations have driven preventable poisonings and serious neurologic events [1] [6] [4]. Both perspectives appear in the sources: one stresses established safety within approved dosing [5], the other documents harm from misuse and overdose [1] [4].

Limitations: This summary uses regulatory guidance, media reporting and case-based clinical literature from the supplied set; specific onset intervals and precise dose–effect thresholds are not provided in those sources and thus are not asserted here [1] [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the standard treatments and antidotes for severe ivermectin overdose in adults and children?
How does ivermectin toxicity differ between veterinary formulations and human formulations?
Which dose and time thresholds predict neurological complications from accidental oral ivermectin ingestion?
What diagnostic tests and monitoring are recommended after suspected ivermectin overdose?
Are there long-term neurological or visual sequelae following significant ivermectin toxicity?