What official statements or clarifications has Dr. Jennifer Ashton issued about unauthorized product endorsements?
Executive summary
Dr. Jennifer Ashton has repeatedly and publicly denied endorsing a string of weight‑loss supplements and gummies that have circulated with her image and voice, calling the advertisements fraudulent and saying her likeness was used without authorization; she has posted on social platforms and supplied emailed statements to fact‑checkers to that effect [1] [2]. Her clarifications stress she has no commercial connection to products named in the ads (examples include “Keto” or CBD gummies, LipoLess, BurnSlim/BurnPeak variants), that the clips often use manipulated audio or AI deepfakes, and that legal remedies are being pursued against perpetrators [1] [3] [2].
1. The core denial: “I do not endorse or manufacture these products”
Dr. Ashton has made a succinct public denial that she endorses, manufactures, distributes, or is affiliated with the weight‑loss gummies and supplement brands being sold using her name and image, stating plainly that those ads are scams and illegal and warning followers not to trust them [2] [3]. This theme is echoed across multiple reporting outlets: Snopes reported that Ashton posted on Instagram and provided an emailed statement asserting her non‑involvement, while lifestyle outlets summarized a direct caption from her saying the promotions were fraudulent and would face prosecution [1] [2].
2. Evidence cited in her clarifications: manipulated audio and unauthorized likenesses
Ashton and third‑party fact‑checkers have documented that many viral ads include AI‑generated or manipulated audio and altered video clips that falsely make it sound as if she praised specific products, and that her image and voice were used without authorization to create those impressions [1] [4]. Snopes noted an instance in which an AI‑generated audio clip in an ad falsely quoted her praising “Keto BHB gummies,” and other investigative sites mapped the technique to deepfake and clip‑editing methods used across multiple celebrity targets [1] [3] [4].
3. Public channels and legal posture: social posts, emailed statements, and threats of prosecution
Dr. Ashton has communicated these clarifications via her verified social media accounts and via email to reporters and fact‑checkers; in at least one public post she warned followers directly and announced that legal action was being taken against those responsible for the fraudulent ads [2] [1]. Multiple consumer‑facing articles and scam watchdog sites quote her statement and note that she urged people only to trust promotions posted on her own channels and her wellness platform, Ajenda, which she positions as her official, science‑based outlet [3] [5].
4. The broader context she highlights: consumer harm, AI abuse, and misleading regulatory claims
In her clarifications and in coverage by consumer sites, attention is drawn to how scammers blend polished production, false claims like “FDA‑registered” or “manufactured under GMP,” and AI‑generated endorsements to create trust and extract purchases or personal data, a tactic that Ashton’s statements explicitly warn against [6] [4]. Reporting on Trustpilot complaints and scam sites documents consumers receiving poor products, unauthorized charges, or vanishing storefronts after purchase, which aligns with the warnings Ashton and consumer advocates repeat about risk [7] [8].
5. What the sources do and do not show—limits of the public record
Available reporting shows Dr. Ashton has issued explicit denials, identified unauthorized use of her likeness and manipulated audio, and signaled legal responses and guidance to follow her official channels [1] [2] [3]. The sources do not provide full public details of the legal filings or outcomes she referenced, nor exhaustive documentation linking every viral ad to a single operator, so claims about prosecutions or final legal results cannot be confirmed from the material reviewed here [1] [2] [4].