Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Can pelvic floor exercises (Kegels) or the ‘squeeze’ technique lead to orgasm without ejaculation?
Executive summary
Research and reporting show pelvic‑floor (Kegel) training and “squeeze”/behavioral techniques are commonly taught as ways to delay ejaculation and can help some people experience orgasm without ejaculation (a “dry” orgasm or NEMO), but experts disagree about how reliably they work and whether Kegels are necessary or even helpful for everyone (examples: claims of improved stamina and dry orgasms [1] [2] [3] versus warnings that kegels are unnecessary or potentially harmful if misused [4]). Clinical and popular sources report substantial success rates for men with premature ejaculation after pelvic‑floor work, while women's sources emphasize improved sensation and stronger orgasms for some but not all [1] [5] [6] [7].
1. What the advocates say: pelvic‑floor control can produce orgasm without ejaculation
Instructional and experiential accounts argue that strengthening and learning to control the pubococcygeus/PC muscles helps people stop the ejaculatory reflex at or near climax, producing orgasm without seminal emission; guides cite Kegels, squeeze and start–stop methods and report users learning “dry” orgasms or nonejaculatory multiple orgasms (NEMO) after training [2] [8] [3]. Several consumer and sex‑advice pages present studies or user data suggesting improved stamina or control — one article cites a study with an 83% improvement in latency for men using pelvic‑floor strengthening for premature ejaculation [1].
2. Clinical and journalistic reporting: some evidence, some limits
Medical summaries and sex‑health outlets frame pelvic‑floor rehabilitation as an evidence‑backed option for premature ejaculation and sexual function, noting Kegels can delay orgasm and improve blood flow and sexual response in some people [5] [1]. However, reporting from clinicians to mainstream press also cautions that Kegels are not a universal fix: specialists told Business Insider that Kegels won’t necessarily improve orgasms for people who already have normal pelvic‑floor function and, if done incorrectly, can cause muscle overactivity or harm [4].
3. How the techniques are said to work (physiology and practice)
Advocates describe the mechanism as voluntary contraction or timed clenching of the pelvic‑floor muscles to modulate reflex arcs involved in ejaculation and to strengthen the same muscles that produce orgasmic contractions; practicing contractions (Kegels) and applying a squeeze near the point of inevitability are taught to interrupt emission/ejaculation while preserving orgasmic sensation [8] [2] [3]. Clinical overviews link PFMT to improved blood flow and pelvic support that may enhance orgasmic intensity for some people with vaginas as well [6] [7].
4. Evidence strength and disagreements among sources
There is a split between enthusiast/educational pieces that report high success or clear paths to dry orgasms and more cautious clinical reporting. Some sources present trial results or practice‑based numbers (for example, studies and aggregated user reports cited by product or program sites) claiming large improvements in control [1] [5]. Other reporting stresses the absence of universal benefit and warns of possible harm from inappropriate or excessive Kegels — implying the evidence base is mixed, context‑dependent, and practice/technique sensitive [4].
5. Practical takeaways and cautions
If someone wants to try: pelvic‑floor training and behavioral techniques like squeeze and start–stop are commonly recommended first‑line non‑pharmacologic approaches for ejaculatory control and are taught as a path to orgasms without ejaculation for some people [5] [2]. But clinicians warn not to assume they’re necessary for everyone; incorrect technique or overtraining can produce pelvic‑floor tension or other dysfunction, so guidance from a pelvic‑floor physical therapist or a clinician is advisable when outcomes are poor or symptoms (pain, urinary changes) appear [4] [9].
6. Where reporting is sparse or unresolved
Available sources give user reports and some clinical trial references about improved control and multiple orgasms, but they do not settle how common reliable nonejaculatory orgasm ability is across populations, nor do they provide large, definitive randomized trials quantifying long‑term rates of dry orgasm success or optimal training regimens; those specifics are not found in the current reporting provided here (not found in current reporting).
Bottom line: pelvic‑floor strengthening and squeeze/behavioral methods can enable some people to experience orgasm without ejaculation and are supported as treatment options for ejaculatory control, but they are not guarantees, and some clinicians caution about overuse or incorrect technique — seek professional assessment if you have concerns or unexpected symptoms [1] [2] [4] [5].