What are the known side effects and drug interactions of Lipoless ingredients?

Checked on January 12, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Lipoless is marketed in different forms and, for the product sold by Laboratorios Eticos Paraguay, contains the active ingredient tirzepatide, a dual GLP‑1/GIP receptor agonist that alters appetite and insulin sensitivity [1]. Public reporting shows a mixed safety picture: official product guidance flags contraceptive precautions and warns about alcohol‑related hypoglycemia risk with diabetes medicines [2], while independent and regulatory sources warn that non‑standard “lipolysis” or supplement products using other ingredients can carry serious local and systemic harms [3] [4].

1. What Lipoless claims to contain and why that matters

The Lipoless product page identifies tirzepatide as the active ingredient and describes it as a dual GLP‑1 and GIP agonist that reduces hunger and improves insulin sensitivity — mechanisms that explain both its therapeutic intent for obesity and type 2 diabetes and the classes of side effects clinicians watch for with incretin mimetics [1]. Important contextual reporting finds that “Lipoless” as a marketplace name is not uniform: several sellers and supplement versions use the same brand label but may omit ingredient lists or change formulations, creating uncertainty about what any given consumer actually ingests or injects [5] [6].

2. Known and advised side effects tied to the tirzepatide product page and class effects

The manufacturer’s consumer guidance recommends barrier contraception for four weeks after starting or increasing dose — a practical safety instruction on the label — and warns that alcohol can exacerbate low blood sugar risk when combined with diabetes medications and can worsen gastrointestinal side effects like nausea [2]. While the company materials frame tirzepatide as an “innovative drug” for obesity and diabetes, external reporting highlights that claims of no side effects are unsupported and independent scrutiny of efficacy and safety remains necessary [7].

3. Reported harms from other “Lipoless” formulations and fat‑dissolving injections

Separate reporting about non‑FDA‑approved fat‑dissolving injections, which are sometimes marketed under names similar to “Lipoless” or “lipodissolve,” describes serious adverse outcomes including skin necrosis, permanent scarring and other local tissue damage; the FDA explicitly cautions that phosphatidylcholine and sodium deoxycholate mixtures used in unapproved injections are unassessed and have caused consumer harm [3] [4]. Consumer complaints and review sites also document inconsistent ingredient labeling, altered shipments, and allegations of scams, underscoring product variability and the risk that an item sold under the Lipoless name may not match clinical expectations [6].

4. Drug interactions and practical precautions reported in sources

Manufacturer FAQs and safety notes advise moderation with alcohol because it can raise hypoglycemia risk in people taking diabetes drugs and can aggravate GI side effects such as nausea [2], a specific interaction consumers should heed; broader supplement literature cited in related pieces warns some weight‑loss compounds and fibers can slow absorption of other medicines, though that material references different products (e.g., glucomannan in Lipozene) and should not be conflated without ingredient confirmation [8] [9]. Given the variability of “Lipoless” products on the market, the practical precaution from reviewers and watchdogs is to consult a clinician before combining any formulation with antidiabetic agents, anticoagulants, psychoactive drugs or hormonal contraception, because the exact interaction profile depends on the confirmed ingredients [5] [7].

5. Where reporting is clear and where it is silent — the essential consumer takeaway

Reporting is clear that the branded Lipoless produced by Laboratorios Eticos Paraguay contains tirzepatide and therefore carries the class‑specific considerations manufacturers outline [1] [2], and regulators have warned that unrelated, unapproved injectable “fat‑dissolvers” have caused serious harm [3]. What is not resolvable from available sources is the complete adverse‑event frequency for every market variant labeled “Lipoless,” because multiple sellers use the name, some listings omit full ingredient disclosure, and independent safety data for non‑standard supplements remain limited [5] [6]. The authoritative path is to verify the exact product and ingredients before judging risks and to involve a healthcare professional when combining any weight‑loss product with prescription medicines.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the documented side effects of tirzepatide in clinical trials and real‑world reports?
How do FDA warnings about non‑approved fat‑dissolving injections translate into consumer legal and medical risks?
How can consumers verify the authenticity and ingredient list of weight‑loss products sold under the same brand name?