Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there long-term anatomical changes from anal sex?
Executive summary
Research and mainstream sexual-health organizations say routine, consensual anal sex does not typically cause major long-term anatomical damage, but it is associated with small increased risks of specific problems such as fecal incontinence, anal sphincter injury, hemorrhoid aggravation, and higher STI transmission if precautions aren’t used [1] [2] [3]. Several large surveys and narrative reviews find associations between lifetime anal intercourse and higher reported rates of fecal incontinence or anorectal dysfunction, though those data do not prove causation and experts note many people who practice anal sex experience no lasting problems [4] [2] [5].
1. What the medical mainstream says: usually safe, with measurable risks
Public-health outlets and clinicians emphasize that the anus has delicate, thin internal tissue that can tear, which raises risks for infection and injury; with proper precautions (plenty of lubricant, condoms, going slowly, stopping for pain), most people don’t experience long-term harm, though hemorrhoids can be aggravated and there’s a “very small” lifetime risk of leakage or prolapse cited by Planned Parenthood [3] [6] [1].
2. Evidence of associations: higher reported incontinence and sphincter injury
Epidemiologic analyses — including national-survey-based studies — show that people who report ever having anal intercourse also report higher prevalence of fecal incontinence and anorectal dysfunction in some datasets, and narrative reviews summarize cases of fecal incontinence and anodyspareunia linked to penetrative anal sex [4] [2]. Those studies document association and prevalence, not direct proof that anal sex is the causal factor [4].
3. Causation is contested; researchers warn of confounding factors
Several doctors and reviewers caution that studies suffer from limitations: they may not control for childbirth, surgery, neurologic disease, frequency/intensity of anal activity, or other pelvic-floor stressors; critics therefore urge caution before concluding routine anal sex causes long-term incontinence for most people [4] [7]. Vice and other outlets note the majority who have anal sex still retain normal bowel control, underscoring that data don’t show cause-and-effect for most individuals [5].
4. Who may be at greater risk — anatomy, obstetric history, and practice
Commentators and surgical authors point out women can have higher baseline risk of incontinence because of pelvic-floor changes from pregnancy and childbirth, and some clinicians report increased rates of sphincter injury among women who engage in anal intercourse [8] [2]. Frequency, roughness, existing pelvic-floor weakness, or prior sphincter trauma can plausibly increase risk; reviews and case notes recommend tailored assessment and physical therapy when symptoms arise [2] [7].
5. Other long-term concerns: STIs, tears, hemorrhoids, and pain disorders
Beyond structural issues, the thin mucosa and higher likelihood of microtears during anal sex increase the chance of transmitting HIV and other STIs; untreated infections can have long-term health consequences [3] [9]. Anal sex can also irritate or worsen hemorrhoids and contribute to chronic pain syndromes such as anodyspareunia, which pelvic-floor therapy may help treat [1] [2] [6].
6. Practical harm-reduction: what providers and guides recommend
Health sources uniformly recommend practical measures: use ample water-based lubricant, condoms for STI prevention, communicate and stop for pain, progress slowly, and seek medical evaluation for persistent bleeding, pain, or incontinence; pelvic-floor physical therapy is offered as a treatment/prevention strategy when dysfunction emerges [6] [1] [2].
7. How to interpret the headlines and advice: read methods, not just claims
Newspaper and opinion pieces can amplify risks without clarifying study limits; The Guardian and others highlight rising reporting and clinical concern but base conclusions on a mix of observational studies and clinical experience [8]. Conversely, sex-education and health outlets stress that “most but not all” people are fine — both perspectives rely on the same imperfect evidence and different emphases [5] [6].
8. Bottom line for readers: informed choice and prompt care
If you enjoy anal sex, available sources advise using precautions to minimize injury and STI risk and to monitor symptoms; if you experience persistent pain, bleeding, or any loss of bowel control, seek evaluation — pelvic-floor specialists can assess and often treat dysfunction [6] [2]. Available sources do not prove that routine consensual anal sex inevitably causes long-term anatomical damage for most people, but they document measurable risks and recommend prevention and early care [5] [1].