What clinical trials have tested manuka honey for blood sugar control in type 2 diabetes?

Checked on December 4, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Clinical trial evidence specifically testing Manuka honey for blood sugar control in people with type 2 diabetes is very limited; most human clinical work cited in the available reporting examines honey generally or measures Manuka’s glycaemic index rather than long-term glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes [1] [2]. Animal experiments show promising pancreatic effects after short-term Manuka feeding in diabetic rats, but those are preclinical and not clinical trials in humans [3] [4].

1. What the literature actually tested: glycaemic response vs. diabetes outcomes

The clearest clinical data in the supplied sources measure the glycaemic index (GI) of Manuka honey in human volunteers, not long-term diabetes endpoints; one controlled GI study reported moderate GI values of 54–59 for five Manuka samples, with blood glucose peaking about 30 minutes after ingestion [2]. That finding addresses the acute glucose response to a single dose compared with glucose standards, not whether regular Manuka consumption improves HbA1c, fasting glucose, insulin resistance, or clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients [2].

2. Human trials claiming benefit: marketing summaries, not peer‑reviewed diabetic RCTs

Several commercial and popular-health sites summarize “clinical trials” or an “8‑week trial” where patients with type 2 diabetes replaced sugar with honey and saw improvements, but those writeups are not linked to peer‑reviewed clinical trial reports in the supplied results and appear as secondary summaries or marketing content [5] [1] [6]. Available sources do not provide a published randomized controlled trial that specifically tests Manuka honey as an intervention for blood sugar control in people with type 2 diabetes and reports standard diabetes outcomes.

3. Preclinical evidence: rat models show pancreatic/regenerative signals

Controlled animal studies fed Manuka honey to diabetic rats and measured glucose, insulin, oxidative stress and pancreatic transcription factors; a recent alloxan‑diabetic rat study gave Manuka at 3 g/kg/day for 21 days and reported improved histology and transcription factor expression compared with untreated controls [3] [4]. Those results suggest biological plausibility but are not clinical evidence in humans and cannot by themselves justify recommending Manuka for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes [3] [4].

4. Safety concerns and counterarguments from wound‑care literature

Manuka’s distinctive chemistry (high methylglyoxal, MGO) underpins its antibacterial reputation but also provokes caution: a commentary flagged that MGO could be a potential risk in diabetic ulcer healing and called for randomized controlled trials to determine safety in diabetic populations [7]. That commentary notes that while honey has some RCT support for wound healing broadly, quality varies and diabetic‑specific effects need direct study [7].

5. Clinical nuance: honey is carbohydrate — immediate glycaemic effects matter

Clinical‑advice‑style sources emphasize that honey still raises blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes and should be treated as a carbohydrate [8] [9]. The GI work shows Manuka is moderate GI, not low GI; thus any benefit over table sugar is relative and modest, and portion size remains crucial for people managing blood glucose [2] [8] [9].

6. Where claims exceed the evidence: marketing vs. science

Several vendor and promotional pages attribute broader metabolic benefits to Manuka (lowering blood glucose, reversing oxidative pancreatic damage, immune boosts) and cite animal studies or GI data as proof; those claims extend beyond what the cited human clinical data demonstrate [6] [1] [10]. In the available sources, human clinical trials that directly test Manuka honey as a therapeutic for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes are not documented — marketing summaries cite trials but do not provide primary trial reports [5] [1].

7. Bottom line for patients and clinicians

Available sources show Manuka has moderate GI in acute testing (GI ~54–59) and promising preclinical pancreatic effects in rats, but they do not show randomized controlled trials in people with type 2 diabetes demonstrating improved long‑term glycaemic control [2] [3] [4]. Clinicians should treat Manuka like any other sugar-containing food: consider carbohydrate content and short‑term glucose effects; weigh topical wound uses (where RCTs exist for some honey products) against concerns about MGO in diabetic wounds and the absence of diabetes‑specific oral therapeutic trials [7] [2].

Limitations: reporting available to this review does not include any published RCTs of oral Manuka honey for improving HbA1c or other long‑term glucose outcomes in type 2 diabetes; if such trials exist, they are not found in the supplied sources (not found in current reporting).

Want to dive deeper?
Which randomized controlled trials have evaluated manuka honey versus standard care for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes?
What were the effects of manuka honey on HbA1c, fasting glucose, and insulin resistance in clinical studies?
Are there safety concerns or reported adverse effects of manuka honey in patients with type 2 diabetes?
How do study designs (dose, duration, honey grade/mgo) influence outcomes of manuka honey trials for blood sugar control?
What do systematic reviews and meta-analyses conclude about honey, specifically manuka honey, for glycemic management in type 2 diabetes?