Masturbation drives to blindness or to any other view diminuition ?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The long-running claim that masturbation causes blindness is a myth with no broad scientific support; multiple contemporary medical and sex‑health sources state clearly that masturbation does not lead to blindness or general vision loss [1] [2] [3]. Historical texts and moral campaigns from the 18th and 19th centuries popularized the idea — notably Samuel‑Auguste Tissot’s writings — but modern reviews and clinical commentary reject the causal link [3] [4].
1. How the myth began: moral panic turned medical claim
The idea that self‑stimulation could produce catastrophic physical outcomes, including blindness, traces to moral and medical writings in the 18th century; Samuel‑Auguste Tissot’s l’Onanisme is cited as a pivotal early source arguing sexual “dissipation” harmed the nerves and eyes, and broader religious and social campaigns reinforced that message [3] [4]. Contemporary historians and commentators say these were cultural controls dressed up as science rather than evidence‑based medicine [3].
2. Modern medical consensus: no evidence masturbation causes blindness
Recent, medically reviewed articles and sex‑health experts state that masturbation will not lead to blindness or long‑term physical or mental disease; major consumer health writeups and sex therapy sources explicitly debunk the blindness claim as an enduring myth [2] [1] [5]. Journalistic reviews and sexology histories likewise conclude there is “literally zero scientific evidence” that routine masturbation causes blindness [3].
3. Where the rumor persists and why it’s sticky
The myth endures because it was spread for centuries by religious authorities, physicians with limited data, and popular culture; it also survives as a memorable “scare line” in sex education and folklore, despite repeated debunking in modern sources [3] [6]. Health communicators note shame, stigma, and the dramatic nature of the claim keep it circulating online and in social discourse [1] [5].
4. Narrow, contextual caveats: eye health and special cases
Some reports and patient anecdotes raise a narrower point: intense sexual activity can temporarily affect intraocular pressure in people with certain eye conditions. A glaucoma patient and clinician commentary described measurable intraocular pressure rises during sexual arousal for that individual, and the author argued this could matter for glaucoma risk in specific patients [7]. That is not evidence that masturbation causes blindness generally, but it does show there are special medical contexts where sexual physiology can interact with preexisting eye disease [7].
5. Misattributed mechanisms — zinc, nutrients and “vital fluids”
Historical claims leaned on theories about “vital fluids” or nutrient loss (for example, zinc) during orgasm as a mechanism for vision loss; modern reviewers reject those mechanisms as biologically implausible and unsupported by data [4] [8]. Contemporary myth‑busting pieces point out simple population math and biological understanding make the proposed nutrient‑depletion explanation untenable [4].
6. Practical guidance for readers worried about vision
If you have normal eye health, mainstream medical sources say masturbation is not a threat to your vision [2] [1]. If you have glaucoma, elevated intraocular pressure, or other documented eye disease, consult an ophthalmologist about how sexual activity temporarily affects your eye pressures and whether any management steps are warranted; a small body of anecdotal or single‑practitioner data suggests this could be relevant in limited cases [7].
7. Why debunking matters: stigma, health literacy and agendas
Debunking this myth matters because it has been used as a lever of social control and shame, not public health; several sources identify historical moral agendas (religious or social) behind spreading alarmist claims about masturbation [3] [6]. Modern health outlets aim to remove stigma and correct misinformation while acknowledging isolated clinical circumstances where sexual physiology intersects with preexisting disease [1] [2] [7].
Limitations and transparency: available sources do not mention large-scale clinical trials specifically measuring masturbation frequency and incident blindness; contemporary statements rely on historical analysis, clinical consensus, myth‑debunking reviews, and a small number of patient‑level observations about intraocular pressure [3] [2] [7].