How do Medicaid expansion and state decisions affect ACA subsidy eligibility?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Medicaid expansion was designed to cover adults up to about 138% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), and the ACA’s Marketplace subsidies were structured to begin at 100% FPL on the assumption Medicaid would cover those below 100% — a mismatch that created a “coverage gap” in non‑expansion states and still affects subsidy eligibility today [1] [2]. As of mid‑2025, ten states had not fully adopted expansion, leaving an estimated 1.4 million uninsured adults in the coverage gap; in expansion states, people under ~138% FPL generally go to Medicaid and those above that threshold can get Marketplace subsidies [2] [3].
1. How the ACA’s original design links Medicaid and Marketplace subsidies
The ACA assumed states would expand Medicaid to cover non‑elderly adults up to 133% of FPL (effectively 138% after income counting rules), and it set Marketplace premium tax credit eligibility to start at 100% FPL because those below that were expected to be on Medicaid [1] [4]. That design means federal subsidy rules and Medicaid income rules were intentionally coordinated using MAGI definitions to avoid duplication and ease single‑application systems [4].
2. The practical result: who gets subsidies, who gets Medicaid
In states that adopted the ACA expansion, adults with incomes below about 138% FPL are generally eligible for Medicaid, while people with incomes above that threshold are the primary pool for Marketplace premium tax credits and cost‑sharing reductions [3] [4]. Calculations and specific dollar thresholds change with the federal poverty guidelines each year, but the ~138% line is the central dividing point in expansion states [3].
3. The coverage gap in non‑expansion states — the policy consequence
When the Supreme Court made expansion optional in 2012, some states declined to expand and left lower‑income adults without an affordable path: people with incomes below the poverty line who aren’t eligible under old state Medicaid rules are often ineligible for Marketplace subsidies because the subsidies originally begin at 100% FPL — producing the so‑called “coverage gap” [1] [2]. GovFacts estimated about 1.4 million uninsured adults were in that gap across the ten non‑expansion states as of early 2025 [2].
4. State variation and the Wisconsin anomaly
States that did not fully expand vary in their approaches. Wisconsin, for example, created a narrower coverage pathway before the ACA’s expansion by extending eligibility up to 100% FPL under a waiver, so it lacks the same kind of gap for people between 100% and 138% FPL that other non‑expansion states have [2]. This illustrates that state decisions — not just a binary expansion/no‑expansion choice — shape who becomes eligible for Medicaid versus Marketplace subsidies [2].
5. Recent policy changes and near‑term uncertainty for subsidies
Federal actions since 2020 (e.g., ARP, IRA, later federal legislation) temporarily changed subsidy generosity and eligibility rules (removing the 400% FPL cap and changing how much people pay), and further legislative changes in 2025 altered enrollment and verification procedures — but the structural link between Medicaid expansion and starting points for Marketplace subsidies remains central to eligibility [5] [6]. When subsidy enhancements expire or are modified, the income ranges that determine Marketplace subsidy eligibility can shift back toward the ACA’s original thresholds, magnifying the practical effects of whether a state expanded Medicaid [5] [7].
6. What this means for individuals shopping for coverage
If you live in an expansion state and your household income is below ~138% FPL, you will likely be directed toward Medicaid; if above, you will likely be eligible for Marketplace subsidies — but annual poverty guidelines and temporary federal policy changes can change cutoffs and generosity [3] [5]. If you live in a non‑expansion state and your income is below state Medicaid rules but under 100% FPL, you may find yourself in the coverage gap with neither Medicaid nor Marketplace subsidies [1] [2].
7. Limits of current reporting and competing perspectives
Available sources document the design, state differences, and estimates of the coverage gap, and they point to evolving subsidy rules that affect affordability [1] [2] [5]. Sources disagree or vary on specifics such as exact enrollment counts, how each state’s waivers or partial expansions function, and the timing/impact of recent federal law changes; for example, some trackers list ten non‑expansion states while others discuss state‑level waiver approaches like Wisconsin’s that complicate a simple expanded/not‑expanded label [2] [8]. Available sources do not mention how any individual state’s rules may have changed after the cited mid‑2025 updates unless the source explicitly states such a change [3] [8].
Bottom line: whether you qualify for Medicaid versus ACA Marketplace subsidies depends primarily on your household income and whether your state has adopted the ACA expansion (the ~138% FPL threshold), but state‑level waivers and recent federal subsidy changes alter the lived reality and can leave low‑income adults without affordable options in non‑expansion states [3] [2] [5].