What medical evidence has been released publicly about injuries to both Renee Good and Jonathan Ross?

1. What has been released about Renee Good’s injuries and medical care

Reporting indicates Renee Good was taken to Hennepin County Medical Center and pronounced dead after the Jan. 7 encounter, and she is widely reported to have been shot during the incident; outlets summarizing the scene cite that she was shot and later died at the hospital ^[1]. Beyond that high-level summary, the publicly available materials referenced here do not include a released autopsy report, hospital records, or detailed medical findings describing wound trajectories, ballistics, or time of death; those specific medical documents have not been cited in the reporting provided ^[1].

2. What has been released about Jonathan Ross’s injuries

Multiple news outlets report that two U.S. officials briefed on the matter — and later DHS confirmations relayed to reporters — say Jonathan Ross suffered internal bleeding to his torso after the encounter and was treated at a hospital and released the same day ^{[2] [3] [4]}. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told reporters Ross “went to the hospital” after being “hit by the vehicle,” that a doctor treated him, and that he was released; DHS later confirmed the internal bleeding but did not quantify its severity ^{[2] [3]}.

3. Limits and inconsistencies in the publicly released medical information

News coverage repeatedly notes the extent of Ross’s internal bleeding is unclear — internal bleeding can range from minor contusion to life-threatening hemorrhage — and officials have declined to provide additional medical detail publicly, leaving ambiguity about diagnosis, imaging, or treatment beyond “treated and released” ^{[2] [4]}. Video of the incident that has circulated has been described in reporting as not clearly showing vehicle contact with officers, adding a competing evidentiary question about the mechanism of Ross’s alleged injuries ^{[1] [4]}. The absence of released hospital records, imaging, or an independent medical summary in the sources here means the public record on both the nature and timing of Ross’s injuries is incomplete ^{[2] [3]}.

4. How reporting and political context shape the available medical claims

Federal officials and administration figures have emphasized Ross’s hospitalization and injury in their public statements, and several outlets picked up the officials’ briefing that Ross suffered internal bleeding; at the same time, reporting underscores that some independent analyses and video reviewers have not seen clear visual evidence of officers being struck by the vehicle, and Good’s family and local leaders dispute characterizations of her actions — illustrating how selective release of medical claims can bolster competing narratives about self-defense or misconduct ^{[2] [1] [3]}. Fundraising and public advocacy for both sides have followed, and some outlets note online misinformation and competing accounts about Good’s background and the encounter ^{[5] [6]}.

5. Bottom line for what can be stated from public medical evidence

The concrete, publicly reported medical facts available in these sources are: Renee Good was transported to a hospital and pronounced dead (reported by multiple outlets and summarized in contemporaneous coverage) and Jonathan Ross was treated at a hospital and, according to DHS and officials briefed to reporters, suffered internal bleeding to his torso ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Neither full medical records, a released autopsy report for Good, nor detailed clinical reports or imaging for Ross have been produced in the reporting provided here, meaning key medical details necessary to independently verify the severity, timing, and mechanism of injuries have not been made public ^{[2] [1] [4]}.