Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Are there any health reasons why Meghan Markle might have used a surrogate?

Checked on August 10, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there is one documented health condition that could potentially justify surrogate use for Meghan Markle: postpartum preeclampsia [1]. This is a life-threatening condition that Meghan Markle experienced after childbirth, which could influence decisions about future pregnancies due to the serious health risks involved.

However, the overwhelming evidence shows that claims about Meghan Markle actually using a surrogate are unfounded. Multiple sources confirm that supposed evidence supporting surrogacy claims has been debunked, including a fake tweet allegedly from Kensington Palace [2]. The analyses consistently highlight the lack of credible sources supporting any actual surrogacy use [3].

The sources also reveal that fertility challenges related to age could theoretically be a factor, as women over 35 like Meghan Markle face declining fertility rates [4], though this doesn't necessarily require surrogacy.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about the intense media scrutiny and cultural politics surrounding Meghan Markle's pregnancies [5]. This scrutiny has created an environment where conspiracy theories and misinformation thrive, including unfounded "Moonbump" theories suggesting fake pregnancies [6].

Media outlets and conspiracy theorists benefit from perpetuating these surrogacy rumors as they generate significant public interest and engagement [3] [6]. The analyses reveal that much of the speculation stems from public fascination with royal pregnancies rather than factual evidence [6].

An important missing perspective is that Meghan Markle could use her platform to raise awareness about postpartum challenges and women's health issues [7], which provides a more constructive framework for discussing pregnancy-related health concerns.

The question also omits the broader context of societal pressures on motherhood and how public figures like Meghan Markle face unrealistic expectations about pregnancy and childbirth [5].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

While the question itself appears neutral by asking about potential health reasons, it implicitly validates the premise that Meghan Markle used a surrogate, despite multiple sources confirming this claim is unsupported by credible evidence [2].

The question may inadvertently perpetuate conspiracy theories that have been thoroughly fact-checked and debunked [2]. By focusing solely on health reasons for surrogacy use, it ignores the documented evidence that no surrogacy actually occurred [3].

The framing could contribute to the ongoing media storm and public debate that has surrounded the royal family without factual basis [3], potentially serving the interests of those who benefit from sensationalized royal coverage and conspiracy content.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the common health reasons for using a surrogate?
Did Meghan Markle publicly discuss any pregnancy complications?
How does the royal family approach surrogacy and reproductive health?
What are the medical requirements for surrogacy in the UK?
Has Meghan Markle spoken about her experiences with pregnancy and childbirth?