Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What clinical trials support the ingredients in Memory Blast for memory improvement?
Executive summary
Available sources do not mention a supplement called "Memory Blast" or list its ingredients, so there is no direct clinical-trial evidence for that product in the provided reporting (not found in current reporting). The clinical-trial literature cited in the results focuses on investigational drugs, neuromodulation, and lifestyle or device trials for Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and brain health — examples include Phase 1–3 drug trials and TMS/non‑drug studies at academic centers [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What the current search results actually cover: drug and device trials, not dietary supplements
The links returned by your search largely describe academic and sponsor-led clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease and related conditions — for example, investigational molecules moving into Phase 1 or later (GL-II-73 Phase 1 planned, CT1812 START trial) and neuromodulation or behavioral trials at research centers [1] [2] [3] [5]. None of the provided pages are product pages for a dietary supplement named "Memory Blast," and none list supplement ingredients or associated randomized trials for a retail memory supplement (not found in current reporting).
2. Examples of clinical trials in the returned results that relate to “memory” outcomes
The search set includes trials testing candidate drugs and non‑drug interventions aimed at memory or cognitive decline: the GL-II-73 program reported preclinical promise and FDA clearance to begin Phase 1 human trials in early 2025 [1]; START (CT1812) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo‑controlled trial testing effects on early Alzheimer’s cognition [5]; and multiple academic centers list brain-stimulation and behavioral trials focused on memory and network function [2] [3]. Those are drug, device or behavioral studies — not supplement ingredient trials [1] [2] [5].
3. What evidence would be needed to link “Memory Blast” ingredients to clinical trials
To demonstrate that specific ingredients in a supplement improve memory, the reporting would need to include randomized controlled trials (preferably double‑blind, placebo‑controlled) that actually test those ingredients or the product in humans and report standardized cognitive outcomes. The current search results show many trials registered and run through academic centers and registries for drugs, devices and lifestyle interventions, and they point to clinicaltrials.gov as a primary registry for Alzheimer's trials [6] [7]. But none of the results provide randomized‑trial data for named supplement ingredients associated with a product called “Memory Blast” (not found in current reporting).
4. Why academic trials in these results aren't a proxy for supplement claims
Trials listed here — e.g., trials of CT1812, gene‑delivery of BDNF, or neuromodulation protocols — test specific mechanisms and regulated investigational agents with controlled dosing and monitoring [5] [4] [2]. Those results cannot be extrapolated to branded supplements unless those exact compounds, doses and formulations were tested in comparable human trials. The sources emphasize that clinical trials must be registered and that many agents in the Alzheimer’s pipeline are investigational drugs rather than over‑the‑counter supplements [6] [7].
5. How to verify claims about a supplement’s ingredients and trials (practical next steps)
First, obtain the full ingredient list and dosages for Memory Blast (available sources do not mention the product or its ingredients). Second, search clinicaltrials.gov and academic trial pages for those ingredient names or for the product name; the NIA and clinical registries are highlighted by the sources as central resources for locating trials [7] [8]. Third, if you find trials, check study design (randomization, blinding, endpoints), sample size and whether cognitive outcomes were pre‑specified [6]. The returned academic trial pages demonstrate the kinds of registrations and protocols you should expect to find when trials exist [3] [5].
6. Conflicts of evidence and interpretation to watch for
Reporting in these sources shows active, regulated research focused on pharma and device approaches; academic centers advertise recruitment and describe rigorous trial designs [2] [3]. Supplement manufacturers often rely on smaller, industry‑sponsored trials, observational studies, or extrapolations from preclinical work; such evidence is not visible in the provided results. If you encounter company‑funded studies for supplement ingredients, scrutinize trial registration, independent replication, and whether outcomes measured real-world cognition vs. surrogate markers (not found in current reporting).
7. Bottom line for your question
Based on the provided search results, there is no documentation here that any clinical trials support the ingredients in a supplement named "Memory Blast"; the linked material instead documents trials of investigational drugs, neuromodulation and academic studies of memory-related interventions [1] [2] [3] [5] [6]. To substantiate claims about Memory Blast, locate the product’s ingredient list and then search clinicaltrials.gov, NIA resources, or peer‑reviewed trial reports for trials that explicitly test those compounds or the product itself [7] [6].