What ingredients are in Memory Blast and how do they affect the brain?

1. Conflicting ingredient lists — product identity in flux

Publicly available product pages disagree about what “Memo Blast” actually contains: two eBay product listings show Cinnamon Extract (Cinnamomum verum) bark, Tongkat Ali extract (Eurycoma longifolia) root and Wild Yam extract (Dioscorea villosa) root ^{[1] [2] [3]}, while other vendor or review pages list ingredients such as super‑concentrated coffee extract and polyphenols ^[4], or apple cider vinegar, Garcinia cambogia and L‑lysine ^[5], and the official marketing site uses generic language about “brain‑supportive nutrients and herbal extracts” without a verified label ^[6]. This inconsistency suggests multiple formulations, rebrands, or poorly standardized retail listings across marketplaces ^{[1] [6] [4] [5]}.

2. What the named ingredients are known to do — quick pharmacology

When present, cinnamon extract, tongkat ali and wild yam each have distinct biological claims in broader literature: cinnamon extracts are often promoted for antioxidant and metabolic effects; tongkat ali is marketed for hormonal and energy effects; wild yam has traditional uses tied to steroid precursors. The supplied sources list these ingredients on product pages but do not supply clinical trial data tying them specifically to memory enhancement in Memo Blast ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Separately, pages that mention coffee extract and polyphenols highlight stimulant and antioxidant activity that can transiently improve alertness and protect against oxidative stress — claims made on a review site but not substantiated by trial data for this product ^[4].

3. Marketing claims versus evidence — the gap

The official product site frames Memo Blast as “clinically researched” and “made in FDA‑registered, GMP‑certified facilities,” promising improved recall, focus and reduced brain fog, yet the site text is promotional and lacks direct citation of clinical trials supporting the finished supplement ^[6]. Independent reviews and retailer pages repeat benefits language (improved focus, memory, cognitive energy) but do not provide peer‑reviewed studies verifying the exact formula’s efficacy or safety ^{[7] [8] [4]}. In short: marketing asserts benefits; the available reporting does not present authoritative clinical proof tied to a consistent ingredient list ^{[6] [4]}.

4. Safety and authenticity concerns — marketplace signals

Multiple marketplace listings (eBay) and third‑party reviews show diverging ingredient claims and pricing; that pattern often appears in supplements with varying suppliers or private‑label batches, raising questions about product consistency and authenticity ^{[1] [2] [3] [7]}. The official site’s claim of manufacturing in FDA‑registered, GMP‑certified facilities does not replace a verifiable, standardized Supplement Facts label and third‑party lab testing that are not shown in the available sources ^[6].

5. Competing viewpoints in the sources — cautious optimism versus skepticism

Promotional pages and some review writeups present Memo Blast as a “premium” or “advanced” nootropic backed by clinically researched ingredients ^{[6] [4]}. By contrast, investigative or marketplace reporting included here focuses on ingredient lists and safety signals without endorsing the product’s claims; these sources highlight uncertainty and inconsistent labeling rather than definitive support ^{[1] [2] [3] [7]}.

6. What consumers should verify before buying

Given the conflicting ingredient disclosures, consumers should demand a full, current Supplement Facts label, third‑party certificate of analysis, and clear dosing information from the seller — none of which appear in the supplied sources ^{[6] [4] [5]}. If you rely on specific active ingredients (e.g., bacopa, citicoline, phosphatidylserine) for proven cognitive effects, note that those ingredients appear in other products (like IQ Blast Pro) but are not consistently listed for Memo Blast in available reporting ^{[9] [10]}.

7. Bottom line — limited, inconsistent reporting; act accordingly

Available sources show inconsistent ingredient lists for Memo Blast and promotional claims but do not provide an authoritative ingredient panel or clinical trials proving the formula’s effects on memory ^{[1] [6] [4] [5]}. Consumers and clinicians should treat efficacy claims with caution, seek an up‑to‑date Supplement Facts label and independent testing, and consider alternatives with consistent, peer‑reviewed evidence if clinical support is the priority ^{[6] [9]}.