Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What ingredients are in Memory Blast and what evidence supports their cognitive benefits?
Executive summary
Available sources show multiple products named “Memo/MemoBlast/Memo Blast” and similarly named “IQ Blast Pro” or “Nature’s Blast” on commercial and review sites, but there is no single authoritative label sheet for a product called exactly “Memory Blast.” Product pages and third‑party reviews list ingredients such as cinnamon extract, tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia), wild yam, coffee extract, citicoline, bacopa, phosphatidylserine and standard vitamins — however ingredient lists vary across vendors and are inconsistent between sources [1] [2] [3] [4]. Clinical evidence cited by review outlets refers to ingredient‑level studies rather than randomized trials of the branded products themselves [4] [3].
1. What ingredients do sellers and reviewers list? — Commercial listings are inconsistent
E‑commerce listings for a product labeled “Memo Blast / MemoBlast” list cinnamon extract (Cinnamomum verum) bark, tongkat ali extract (Eurycoma longifolia) root, and wild yam extract (Dioscorea villosa) root [1] [2] [5]. Other retailer and review pages attribute different blends to “MemoBlast” including super‑concentrated coffee extract and polyphenols [3], and still other sites list ingredients such as apple cider vinegar, garcinia cambogia and L‑lysine [6]. Separately, products called “IQ Blast Pro” or “IQ Blast” advertised by review sites emphasize ingredients with clearer nootropic reputations — citicoline, Bacopa monnieri and phosphatidylserine — but those belong to a different branded product family in the available reporting [4] [7].
2. What direct clinical evidence exists for the branded pills? — No rigorous product‑level trials found
Available reporting and product pages do not present peer‑reviewed randomized controlled trials that test a “Memo Blast” or “Memory Blast” branded formula head‑to‑head against placebo. Instead, commercial copy and reviews point to clinical logic or cite ingredient research as the basis for claims [8] [2] [4]. In other words, evidence presented in these sources is indirect: studies on single ingredients are used to infer likely benefits of the combined supplement, not proof that the marketed multi‑ingredient product improves cognition in humans under controlled conditions [4].
3. Ingredient‑level evidence cited by reviewers — mixed strength
Review sites promoting IQ Blast Pro and similar supplements cite ingredient‑level research supporting compounds like citicoline, Bacopa monnieri and phosphatidylserine for memory and focus [4]. Another review claims concentrated coffee extracts and polyphenols stimulate brain activity and provide antioxidant protection [3]. These ingredient studies can show small measurable effects in some populations, but the commercial sources acknowledge that benefits derive from the ingredients rather than product‑level clinical trials and that long‑term combined‑formula data are limited [3] [8].
4. Conflicts of interest and marketing framing — what to watch for
Several sources are sales pages or promotional reviews that encourage purchase through official checkout links and emphasize manufacturing claims (FDA‑registered facility, GMP) and high ratings without linking to peer‑reviewed evidence [8] [9]. Review pieces often focus on market positioning and consumer testimonials; some explicitly warn readers to buy through official channels for refunds — a commercial incentive that can bias reporting [9]. Users should note whether a site is an independent review, a merchant, or a press release when weighing claims [9] [2].
5. Practical implications — safety, labeling and what consumers can verify
Because ingredient lists vary across vendors for products with similar names, consumers cannot reliably infer dose or purity from a single page; the exact formulation and amounts matter for efficacy and safety but are not consistently published across the available sources [1] [3] [6]. Where ingredients like Bacopa, citicoline or phosphatidylserine are listed (in the IQ Blast Pro coverage), there is a stronger evidence base at the ingredient level — but available reporting does not confirm those ingredients are present in every “Memo/Memo Blast” product page shown [4].
6. Bottom line and recommended next steps
If you want to judge whether a “Memory Blast” product will help cognition, demand three things: [10] a full, itemized Supplement Facts label showing ingredient amounts for the exact product you’re considering (not a marketing blurb) — this is not consistently available in the sources [1] [3]; [11] peer‑reviewed clinical trials of that branded formula demonstrating benefit (not found in current reporting); and [12] independent third‑party lab testing or certification for purity/safety if you plan long‑term use (some product pages claim GMP or FDA‑registered facilities but do not cite independent test reports) [8]. Available sources do not mention randomized, peer‑reviewed trials of a “Memory Blast” branded product itself.