Who manufactures Neuro Max and has the company faced legal or regulatory action?
Executive summary
Neuro Max’s manufacturing identity is muddled across the public record: a few third‑party reviews identify a supplement-maker called Fyvus and assert U.S. GMP manufacture, while vendor pages and later reviews say no clear manufacturer is disclosed and point to a Florida listing tied to fulfillment problems [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting available in this packet shows consumer complaints and billing/refund disputes but does not document any regulatory enforcement action or formal legal judgments against a clearly identified “Neuro Max” manufacturer [5] [2].
1. Who claims to make Neuro Max — and why the records disagree
A 2018 product profile states that NeuroMax is manufactured by a company named Fyvus and produced in a GMP‑certified U.S. facility, presenting a conventional manufacturer narrative for a dietary supplement [1]. By contrast, recent review sites and the product’s own vendor copy acknowledge an absence of transparent manufacturer information, with one 2025 review noting that the product lacks company details and even an official website, undermining the Fyvus attribution or at least making it unverifiable to consumers today [2] [3]. Separate listings show other products named “NeuroMax” or “Neuromax” sold by different companies — for example, a liquid NeuroMax sold by Nutritional Frontiers and a prescription product called Neuromax cataloged on 1mg — indicating that the brand name is used by multiple, unrelated manufacturers for different formulations, which sows further confusion [6] [7].
2. Consumer complaints, fulfillment partners and the BBB trail
The Better Business Bureau lists a NeuroMax Brain US profile and customer reviews tied to a St. Petersburg, Florida entry that is not BBB‑accredited; those reviews repeatedly flag billing and refund disputes and link several complaints to orders fulfilled by a third‑party called Hashtag Fulfillment, suggesting the immediate problem for consumers is fulfillment and subscription billing practices rather than a product safety recall [4] [5]. The BBB synopsis advises caution with trials and warns of unauthorized or unexpected charges associated with products shipped by Hashtag Fulfillment, which aligns with multiple consumer complaints about billing and refund handling [5].
3. What the sources say — and what they don’t
Available sources make explicit claims about manufacturing in some instances and opacity in others: Consumer Health Digest asserts a Fyvus manufacturer and GMP manufacture [1], while Health Insiders and the product’s official site concede a lack of manufacturer transparency and an absence of a manufacturer-issued return policy [2] [3]. None of the supplied reporting documents an FDA warning letter, a product seizure, a civil judgment against a named Neuro Max manufacturer, or an enforcement action by a consumer protection agency; the records instead show customer complaints and critical reviews pointing to poor business practices and ambiguous corporate identity [5] [2].
4. Reading motives and the risk of conflation
Marketing pages naturally present product claims and positive testimonials and may omit corporate details that would enable verification [3], while affiliate review sites sometimes repeat manufacturer names or quality assertions without presenting primary documentation, creating a recycled echo that can harden into inaccurate consensus [1] [2]. The presence of multiple products using the NeuroMax/Neuromax name (dietary liquids, supplements, and an unrelated prescription formulation) means casual aggregation of complaints or praise can conflate distinct makers and regulatory contexts, a hazard visible across the sourced material [6] [7].
5. Bottom line and limits of the record
Based on the supplied reporting, the manufacturing attribution for the Neuro Max supplement is inconsistent: an older profile names Fyvus and claims U.S. GMP manufacture, but newer reviews and the vendor footprint show missing manufacturer disclosure and consumer complaints tied to fulfillment partners [1] [2] [3] [5]. The documents provided do not show any formal legal or regulatory enforcement action specifically against a clearly identified Neuro Max manufacturer, only consumer complaints and warnings about billing/refunds; therefore, a definitive statement about regulatory sanctions cannot be made from the available sources [5] [2].