Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the background and history of Neurocept company?
Executive summary
Neurocept appears in two distinct strands of the available record: a dissolved UK private limited company "NEUROCEPT LIMITED" incorporated 20 Nov 2015 and dissolved 25 Apr 2017 (Companies House), and a 2025-branded dietary‑supplement product/company named "Neurocept" launched into the U.S. wellness market via press releases syndicated by GlobeNewswire and other outlets (Nov 7, 2025) [1] [2]. Consumer-complaint and scam‑tracking records (BBB, Trustpilot) tie a Neurocept supplement offering and related affiliate names to refund problems and allegations of counterfeit or scam activity in 2025 [3] [4].
1. Two different “Neurocept” identities — a short-lived UK company and a 2025 supplement brand
Company-registration records from GOV.UK show NEUROCEPT LIMITED as a UK private limited company incorporated on 20 November 2015 and dissolved on 25 April 2017, with filing history and registered office details on Companies House [1] [5]. Separately, press distribution in November 2025 presents "Neurocept" as a newly launched brain‑support supplement entering the U.S. wellness market, positioned as a clinically inspired cognitive‑health product (GlobeNewswire syndicated pieces) [2].
2. What the Companies House record tells us — limited lifespan and basic facts
Public UK company filings list incorporation and dissolution dates, registered office and that the company status is “Dissolved,” but the filings available in the provided results do not include detailed business operations, officers’ biographies, or reasons for dissolution beyond the basic registry entries [1] [5]. Available sources do not mention further UK trading history, products or ongoing subsidiaries tied to that corporate entry.
3. The 2025 Neurocept supplement launch — marketing claims and distribution channel
Multiple newswire and aggregator outlets ran near‑identical copy on Nov. 7, 2025 describing Neurocept as an “advanced brain support supplement” claiming to be “backed by science” and newly entering the U.S. wellness market; that text emphasizes improved focus, memory and cognitive performance and frames the product as clinically inspired [2] [6] [7] [8]. Those items are press-distributed content; the pieces repeat promotional language rather than independent clinical trial data or regulatory filings [2].
4. Consumer complaints and scam reports tied to the supplement brand
The Better Business Bureau’s Scam Tracker and Trustpilot contain consumer reports from 2025 alleging problems: purchasers reporting difficulty getting refunds after returning product, claims the offering may be counterfeit or tied to “Endurox Prime,” and reviewers calling Neurocept LLC a “scam product”; one BBB incident describes a $217 purchase of Neurocept brain‑health pills and a failed refund despite return tracking [3] [4]. Those are consumer allegations and site reviews; they document complaints and perceptions but are not court judgments or regulator determinations in the provided sources [3] [4].
5. Gaps, ambiguities and what the sources do not show
Available sources do not mention a continuous corporate link between the dissolved UK NEUROCEPT LIMITED (2015–2017) and the 2025 Neurocept supplement marketing. The press releases do not cite peer‑reviewed trials, regulatory approvals, or manufacturing/ingredients details in the files shown here [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention independent lab verification, FDA registration/clearance, or named founders/investors for the 2025 supplement beyond press copy [2] [6].
6. Competing perspectives and how to weigh them
Promotional materials present Neurocept as a science‑forward brain supplement and stress consumer benefits [2]. Consumer reviews and the BBB entry present a contrasting picture that alleges poor customer service, refund failures, and potential counterfeit concerns linked to related affiliate names [3] [4]. The company‑registry entry for the UK entity is neutral factual data showing a dissolved company and does not support either marketing claims or the consumer allegations beyond demonstrating the name has prior corporate use in the UK [1] [5].
7. Practical next steps for someone researching or considering purchase
Based on the records, verify the seller’s full legal name, physical address and refund policy; check government or regulatory databases for product registrations or warnings (not found in current reporting) and look for independent clinical studies or lab certificates (not mentioned in these sources) before purchasing [2] [3]. If you have a dispute, documented returns and payment records are the evidence consumer sites recommend when filing disputes with card issuers or reporting scams to BBB [3] [4].
Limitations: This analysis relies only on the provided search results; many questions (corporate continuity, ingredient lists, regulatory status, clinical trial data) are not addressed by the supplied sources and therefore are reported here as “not found in current reporting” rather than disproved [1] [2] [3].