Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Has Neurocept received FDA clearance or CE marking for any products (include year)?

Checked on November 8, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

The available materials do not provide verified evidence that Neurocept has received FDA clearance or CE marking for any product; multiple source excerpts explicitly note a lack of regulatory-approval information and caution that Neurocept sells dietary supplements whose claims are not FDA-evaluated. The documents instead reference filings for related or similarly named entities and describe other companies’ cleared devices, creating potential for confusion between Neurocept and other neurotech firms; further direct checks of FDA 510(k)/PMA and EU CE databases are required to confirm any approvals. [1] [2] [3] [4]

1. What claim was made and why it matters for consumers and clinicians

The central claim under review is whether Neurocept has obtained FDA clearance or CE marking for any product and the year of such approval. This matters because FDA clearance or CE marking indicates a regulatory determination that a device meets safety and performance requirements for marketing in the U.S. or EU, while dietary supplements do not require such approvals and cannot legally claim to treat disease. Several excerpts explicitly state that Neurocept’s product pages carry the standard dietary-supplement disclaimer that statements have not been evaluated by the FDA and that products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent disease, signaling that at least some Neurocept-branded items are positioned as supplements rather than regulated medical devices or drugs [1] [3]. The difference dictates what evidence a purchaser should expect and what regulatory records to consult.

2. What the provided sources actually say — direct evidence is missing

None of the supplied analyses present a definitive FDA 510(k), PMA, De Novo, or CE certificate showing Neurocept as the grantee. Several entries explicitly state an absence of clearance information and recommend further searches of FDA filings: one source summarizes Neurocept Capsules as a dietary supplement and notes the absence of clearance or marking details [1], while another indicates that the site content includes FDA filings for Neurocatch Inc but does not show approval for Neurocept products [2]. A company’s website repeating the dietary-supplement disclaimer is treated in these excerpts as further evidence that no device-level regulatory approvals are shown in the provided materials [3]. Those are repeated conclusions across the dataset, so the documents collectively point to no confirmed approvals.

3. Confusion with other companies — similar names and cleared products

The dataset contains multiple instances where other neurotech companies with similar names or unrelated products are referenced and have clearances, which risks misattribution. One analysis discusses ClearPoint Neuro’s FDA clearance and CE marking for its ClearPoint Neuro Navigation System, but that is explicitly about a different company and product [5]. Another excerpt describes FDA approval for the Neuroguard IEP System (Contego Medical Inc.) and CE activity for NeuroLogica’s CT systems, again unrelated to Neurocept [6] [7]. These items show a plausible source of public confusion: press releases and regulatory databases include many firms with “Neuro” prefixes, and the supplied material flags no instance where Neurocept itself is the recipient of those regulatory actions [5] [6] [7].

4. Gaps, next steps, and where to verify the claim definitively

The supplied analyses repeatedly recommend direct checks of official regulatory registries because the excerpts either lack relevant entries or describe filings without outcomes. To confirm whether Neurocept has received FDA clearance, one should search the FDA’s 510(k), De Novo, and PMA databases for “Neurocept” and related corporate names; to confirm CE marking, one should check EU notified-body records, technical files, or the company’s EU declarations of conformity. The documents at hand show mentions of FDA filings for an entity named Neurocatch Inc but no confirmed approval for Neurocept-branded products, leaving a clear data gap that only primary-regulatory sources can fill [2]. The analyses thus converge on the procedural next step of direct registry verification.

5. How to interpret the evidence and what that implies for claims about years

Because the provided sources contain no confirmed approval entries or dates tied to Neurocept products, any statement asserting that Neurocept received FDA clearance or CE marking in a specific year is unsupported by these materials. Where approvals exist in the corpus, they are tied to different companies and sometimes include dates (for example, Neuroguard’s October 11, 2024 FDA approval is cited), illustrating that the dataset can record dates but has none attributable to Neurocept [6]. The responsible conclusion from these excerpts is that no verifiable year of Neurocept regulatory approval can be asserted; additional authoritative searches would be required to produce an affirmative year.

Want to dive deeper?
Has Neurocept received FDA 510(k) clearance and in what year?
Which Neurocept products, if any, have CE marking and when were they certified?
What regulatory pathway did Neurocept use for any cleared devices (510(k), De Novo, PMA)?
Are there FDA summaries or press releases confirming Neurocept clearances in 2020s?
Has Neurocept marketed devices in the EU based on CE marking and are there notified body records?