How do specific NeuroGold ingredient doses compare with established therapeutic ranges for B‑vitamins and phosphatidylserine?

Checked on February 3, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

NeuroGold’s phosphatidylserine offerings — commonly labeled as 100 mg and 300 mg per serving — sit squarely within the band of doses that prior clinical literature and reference databases identify as potentially therapeutic for age‑related memory concerns, with 300 mg/day aligning well with many study regimens and 100 mg more likely representing a single dose in a multi‑dose daily schedule [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reliable, comparable data for the B‑vitamins reportedly bundled into some “Gold” or branded neuro formulas are not present in the provided reporting, preventing a direct dose‑for‑dose comparison between NeuroGold’s B‑vitamin content and established therapeutic ranges based on these sources [5] [6].

1. NeuroGold’s phosphatidylserine labels vs. clinical/therapeutic guidance

NeuroGold products marketed through PipingRock and NutritionExpress explicitly list phosphatidylserine at 100 mg and 300 mg per capsule or softgel, respectively, which are the precise product claims used to evaluate therapeutic alignment [1] [2] [7] [8]. Clinical reviews and databases note that therapeutic dosing for cognitive support in older adults has commonly been implemented as 100 mg taken two to three times per day (i.e., about 200–300 mg/day), and that doses up to several hundred milligrams are absorbed efficiently in humans — a 2015 review and the Natural Medicine Comprehensive Database are cited in a consumer health summary as supporting 100 mg two or three times daily and noting 300–800 mg/day absorption ranges in studies [3]. ConsumerLab’s product surveys and regulatory commentary also indicate that moderate (single‑dose) and higher daily doses have been tested and marketed, and that quality and source (plant vs. historic bovine) matter when interpreting results [4].

2. What that means practically for 100 mg and 300 mg NeuroGold formulations

A single 100 mg NeuroGold softgel would generally match the per‑dose item used in many therapeutic regimens but would likely require two to three daily doses to hit commonly cited therapeutic totals for memory support (200–300 mg/day), whereas NeuroGold’s 300 mg capsule corresponds to a full day’s worth of PS in a single serving by those same standards and therefore more closely mirrors many clinical trial daily totals [1] [2] [3]. ConsumerLab and clinical sources caution that earlier positive trials used bovine‑derived PS and that modern products are plant‑derived (soy, sunflower, cabbage), which may affect extrapolation of older results to current supplements, and regulators require language noting limited evidence for dementia prevention claims [4] [9].

3. Safety, interactions, and regulatory context relevant to dose comparisons

Authoritative consumer health sites advise that PS is generally well tolerated but can interact with medications (for example, anticholinergic drugs) and that long‑term efficacy evidence is limited — the FDA permits certain label claims only with qualifiers about scant evidence — all of which temper simple dose‑equals‑benefit assumptions [10] [4] [9]. The plant‑derived PS used today avoids historical prion concerns tied to bovine brain extracts, but the net clinical impact of source and dose remains an area of ongoing research, so higher numerical doses do not automatically equal proven clinical benefit [4] [9].

4. The B‑vitamin gap: what cannot be concluded from available reporting

The supplied sources include references to B‑vitamin combination injections and to broader ties between phospholipids and B‑vitamin–related pathways, but they do not list NeuroGold’s specific B‑vitamin ingredient amounts nor do they provide authoritative therapeutic dosing ranges for those B‑vitamins within the context of NeuroGold formulations, so any direct numeric comparison is not supportable from these documents [5] [6]. Without product labels or clinical datasheets for NeuroGold’s B‑vitamin content in the provided reporting, it is not possible to state whether a NeuroGold product’s vitamin B3, B6, B12 or folate levels meet, exceed, or fall short of established therapeutic ranges cited in clinical practice guidelines based on these sources [5] [6].

Conclusion

On phosphatidylserine, NeuroGold’s 300 mg formulation aligns with many therapeutic daily totals reported in studies and databases, while a 100 mg softgel is consistent with a single therapeutic dose that typically requires multiple daily administrations to reach conventional daily targets [2] [1] [3]. For B‑vitamins, the reporting provided does not include product‑specific dose labels or authoritative therapeutic comparators, and therefore no direct, evidence‑backed comparison can be made from these sources [5] [6] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What clinical trials have tested 300 mg/day phosphatidylserine for cognitive decline and what were their designs and outcomes?
How do plant‑derived phosphatidylserine preparations (soy versus sunflower) compare in bioavailability and clinical effect?
What are standard therapeutic dosing ranges for vitamin B6, B12, niacin and folate in neurocognitive support, and where can product‑specific labels be verified?