Who owns the neuromax.us website and which contract manufacturer produces its supplement?

1. The site itself discloses almost nothing about ownership

The Neuro Max “official” website presents product claims and ingredient lists but, according to independent reporting, contains no company information identifying who owns or operates the site and even lacks a conventional corporate website entry for the manufacturer ^[1]. That absence is the first and most important piece of evidence: the operator has not published a named legal entity on the sales pages examined ^[1].

2. A fulfillment company shows up in public consumer filings — not a maker

A Better Business Bureau profile connects orders for a NeuroMax-branded product to Hashtag Fulfillment, LLC in St. Petersburg, Florida, noting the firm has fulfilled and shipped orders for this product line ^[2]. Fulfillment and shipping services indicate logistics and order processing rather than contract manufacturing, so the BBB entry points to who ships the product in some U.S. sales channels but does not prove who formulates or produces the capsules ^[2].

3. Multiple “Neuromax” products exist worldwide with different manufacturers

Outside the neuromax.us storefront, “Neuromax” is a name used by a variety of unrelated products: a vitamin B combination marketed by Global Pharma (a product page under a Middle East domain) describes B1/B6/B12 formulations for neuropathy ^[3]; an online importer labels a Neuromax tablet as “Made in America by Arnet Pharmaceutical Carp / Florida” on a Middle Eastern retailer page ^[4]; an Indian pharma listing identifies a Neuromax 800 mg tablet produced by Milimax Healthcare containing piracetam ^[5]; and ingredient-network listings show a NEUROMAX formulation by Cosmo Pharm SRL with a distinct ingredient profile ^[6]. These disparate entries demonstrate the brand name is not proprietary to a single manufacturer worldwide ^{[3] [4] [5] [6]}.

4. Corporate registry and market-research traces are inconsistent

A PitchBook profile and an archived UK company record point to yet other corporate uses of the Neuromax name — PitchBook links to neuromax.ru and to a drug-development company profile, while UK filings show a NEUROMAX LIMITED company that was dissolved in 2016 ^{[7] [8]}. Those registry hits suggest the term has been used across jurisdictions for different legal entities, further complicating attribution of the neuromax.us site to any single owner or contract manufacturer ^{[7] [8]}.

5. What the sources do and do not prove about neuromax.us ownership and the contract manufacturer

Direct evidence tying neuromax.us to a named owner or to a contract manufacturer is absent in the documents provided: the site itself omits manufacturer details ^[1], BBB records point to a fulfillment partner rather than a producer ^[2], and external “Neuromax” products show multiple unrelated manufacturers in different markets ^{[3] [4] [5] [6]}. Therefore, available reporting does not substantiate a single answer identifying the owner of neuromax.us or naming a specific contract manufacturer for the supplement sold under that domain ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}.

6. Practical implications and investigative next steps

Given the gaps, the most productive next steps would be corporate record and domain WHOIS searches for neuromax.us, subpoena or request order-invoice records from Hashtag Fulfillment for chain-of-custody details, and lab testing of product samples to trace manufacturing lot codes — none of which are available in the cited sources, so they cannot be asserted here ^{[2] [1]}. Consumer-facing signals — a fulfillment address, repeated brand-name reuse, and foreign product listings — instead suggest a multi-sourced brand name often used by independent manufacturers, private-label marketers, or dropship operations rather than a single transparent manufacturer under one corporate umbrella ^{[2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}.