Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How does the No Surprises Act (2020) protect patients from balance billing for emergency care?
Executive summary
The No Surprises Act (NSA), enacted December 27, 2020 and effective January 1, 2022, bars balance billing in many common surprise-bill situations — most notably emergency services and certain out‑of‑network care received at in‑network facilities — by limiting what providers can charge to the patient’s in‑network cost‑sharing amount and creating an insurer‑provider dispute process instead [1] [2] [3]. The law also extends protections to “post‑stabilization” services and some ancillary services, while leaving gaps (e.g., many ground ambulance services and vision/dental‑only plans) that remain outside its protections [4] [5] [6].
1. What the NSA actually prevents: a federal ban on balance billing for emergency care
The NSA generally prohibits out‑of‑network providers and facilities from balance billing patients for emergency services; patients receiving emergency care cannot be charged more than the in‑network cost‑sharing amount such as copays, coinsurance, or deductibles [3] [2] [7]. Federal rulemaking and agency fact sheets emphasize that the law “limits out‑of‑network cost sharing and prohibits ‘balance billing’ in many of the circumstances in which surprise bills arise most frequently,” including emergency department visits [1] [2].
2. How patients are protected at the point of care: “hold harmless” and cost‑sharing limits
Under the NSA, when an emergency occurs a patient must be treated without prior authorization and cannot be hit with surprise balance bills beyond their normal in‑network cost share; the law requires plans and providers to treat the patient as if the services were in‑network for the purpose of patient cost‑sharing [2] [8]. Professional groups and hospital systems summarize this as a “hold harmless” rule — patients pay only the in‑network portion, regardless of whether the treating clinician or facility is technically out of network [9] [10].
3. What happens after the bill: payment negotiations and independent dispute resolution
The NSA removes the patient from provider–insurer payment disputes and establishes a process where insurers and out‑of‑network providers negotiate payment; if they cannot agree, an independent dispute resolution (IDR) process can decide the amount [1] [11]. Agencies framed the law to give insurers and providers a “fair process” to resolve out‑of‑network payment without additional cost to patients, so the financial dispute shifts away from the consumer [11] [1].
4. Extensions and special cases: post‑stabilization and ancillary services
The Act extends the balance‑billing ban to certain services received in conjunction with an emergency visit — including post‑stabilization care until the patient can be safely transferred or consent to an out‑of‑network provider — and to some ancillary specialties like anesthesiology or radiology provided at in‑network facilities [4] [2]. These extensions attempt to close common loopholes where patients receive care from out‑of‑network clinicians inside otherwise in‑network hospitals [2] [4].
5. Important exceptions and remaining gaps
The law does not cover every scenario: many ground ambulance services are explicitly outside the NSA’s protections, and the Act generally does not apply to vision‑only or dental‑only plans; Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, VA and IHS plans are also handled separately because they already have other protections [5] [6] [11]. State laws vary and the NSA was designed to work alongside them, producing a patchwork of protections depending on insurance type and state rules [12] [13].
6. Consumer experience and limits: what patients should expect on their bills
Patients protected under the NSA should receive bills showing only in‑network cost sharing; if they later get a balance bill or think they were charged incorrectly, the law provides dispute and helpdesk resources and requires clear disclosures from providers about billing protections [2] [7]. Reporting and analyses note that while the NSA covers many surprise‑bill contexts, monitoring is needed because out‑of‑network lab, imaging, or other ancillary charges can still surface in complex care pathways [13] [8].
7. Competing viewpoints and the law’s intended tradeoffs
Supporters portray the NSA as a bipartisan fix to massive surprise bills that averaged hundreds to thousands of dollars for many patients, shifting payment fights to insurers and providers [8] [3]. Some provider groups emphasize compliance burdens and payment disputes with insurers, while consumer advocates stress remaining loopholes [4] [12]. The law’s architects deliberately set up an IDR process rather than fixed rates, reflecting a policy tradeoff between protecting patients and preserving negotiation between payers and clinicians [1] [3].
8. Bottom line for patients seeking emergency care
If you have private group or individual coverage subject to the NSA and you receive emergency services, you should not be balance billed beyond your in‑network cost share; instead, your insurer and the out‑of‑network provider must resolve payment through negotiation or IDR [2] [1]. Available sources do not mention any universal elimination of surprise bills for every service — important exceptions remain — so check your plan, and use CMS and state helpdesks if you receive a bill that appears to violate the NSA [2] [7].